Early-onset colorectal cancer patients do not require shorter intervals for post-surgical surveillance colonoscopy Journal Article


Authors: Mendelsohn, R. B.; Hahn, A. I.; Palmaira, R. L.; Saxena, A. R.; Mukthinuthalapati, P. K.; Schattner, M. A.; Markowitz, A. J.; Ludwig, E.; Shah, P.; Calo, D.; Gerdes, H.; Yaeger, R.; Stadler, Z.; Zauber, A. G.; Cercek, A.
Article Title: Early-onset colorectal cancer patients do not require shorter intervals for post-surgical surveillance colonoscopy
Abstract: Background & Aims: Early-onset colorectal cancer (EO-CRC), diagnosed before age 50, is rising in incidence worldwide. Although post-surgical colonoscopy surveillance strategies exist, appropriate intervals in EO-CRC remain elusive, as long-term surveillance outcomes remain scant. We sought to compare findings of surveillance colonoscopies of EO-CRC with patients with average onset colorectal cancer (AO-CRC) to help define surveillance outcomes in these groups. Methods: Single-institution retrospective chart review identified EO-CRC and AO-CRC patients with colonoscopy and no evidence of disease. Surveillance intervals and time to development of advanced neoplasia (CRC and advanced polyps [adenoma/sessile serrated]) were examined. For each group, 3 serial surveillance colonoscopies were evaluated. Statistical analyses were performed utilizing log-ranked Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards. Results: A total of 1259 patients with CRC were identified, with 612 and 647 patients in the EO-CRC and AO-CRC groups, respectively. Compared with patients with AO-CRC, patients with EO-CRC had a 29% decreased risk of developing advanced neoplasia from time of initial surgery to first surveillance colonoscopy (hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.52–1.0). Average follow-up time from surgical resection to first surveillance colonoscopy was 12.6 months for both cohorts. Overall surveillance findings differed between cohorts (P = .003), and patients with EO-CRC were found to have less advanced neoplasia compared with their counterparts with AO-CRC (12.4% vs 16.0%, respectively). Subsequent colonoscopies found that, while patients with EO-CRC returned for follow-up surveillance colonoscopy earlier than patients with AO-CRC, the EO-CRC cohort did not have more advanced neoplasia nor non-advanced adenomas. Conclusions: Patients with EO-CRC do not have an increased risk of advanced neoplasia compared with patients with AO-CRC and therefore do not require more frequent colonoscopy surveillance than current guidelines recommend. © 2024 AGA Institute
Keywords: adult; middle aged; cancer surgery; major clinical study; overall survival; fatigue; cancer recurrence; advanced cancer; cancer patient; cancer staging; follow up; cancer grading; colorectal cancer; incidence; cohort analysis; obesity; practice guideline; medical record review; retrospective study; risk factor; body mass; proportional hazards model; adenoma; colonoscopy; colon cancer; microsatellite instability; recurrent disease; health care system; ulcerative colitis; hazard ratio; kaplan meier method; rectum cancer; adenomatous polyp; race; underweight; surveillance; hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer; disease surveillance; information; neoplasia; sessile serrated adenoma; human; male; female; article; splenic flexure; early-onset colorectal cancer; postoperative monitoring
Journal Title: Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Volume: 22
Issue: 12
ISSN: 1542-3565
Publisher: Elsevier Science, Inc.  
Date Published: 2024-12-01
Start Page: 2517
End Page: 2525.e3
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2024.04.029
PUBMED: 38729386
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC11549250
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- MSK Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA008748) acknowledged in PubMed and PDF -- MSK corresponding author is Robin Mendelsohn -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Hans Gerdes
    176 Gerdes
  2. Arnold J Markowitz
    138 Markowitz
  3. Zsofia Kinga Stadler
    387 Stadler
  4. Emmy Ludwig
    51 Ludwig
  5. Rona Denit Yaeger
    315 Yaeger
  6. Mark Schattner
    168 Schattner
  7. Ann G Zauber
    314 Zauber
  8. Pari Mayank Shah
    47 Shah
  9. Delia   Calo
    10 Calo
  10. Anne Impellizeri Hahn
    17 Hahn