Risk prediction for clonal cytopenia: Multicenter real-world evidence Journal Article


Authors: Xie, Z.; Komrokji, R.; Al Ali, N.; Regelson, A.; Geyer, S.; Patel, A.; Saygin, C.; Zeidan, A. M.; Bewersdorf, J. P.; Mendez, L.; Kishtagari, A.; Zeidner, J. F.; Coombs, C. C.; Madanat, Y. F.; Chung, S.; Badar, T.; Foran, J.; Desai, P.; Tsai, C.; Griffiths, E. A.; Al Malki, M. M.; Amanam, I.; Lai, C.; Deeg, H. J.; Ades, L.; Arana Yi, C.; Osman, A. E. G.; Dinner, S.; Abaza, Y.; Taylor, J.; Chandhok, N.; Soong, D.; Brunner, A. M.; Carraway, H. E.; Singh, A.; Elena, C.; Ferrari, J.; Gallì, A.; Pozzi, S.; Padron, E.; Patnaik, M. M.; Malcovati, L.; Savona, M. R.; Al-Kali, A.
Article Title: Risk prediction for clonal cytopenia: Multicenter real-world evidence
Abstract: Clonal cytopenia of undetermined significance (CCUS) represents a distinct disease entity characterized by myeloid-related somatic mutations with a variant allele fraction of ≥2% in individuals with unexplained cytopenia(s) but without a myeloid neoplasm (MN). Notably, CCUS carries a risk of progressing to MN, particularly in cases featuring high-risk mutations. Understanding CCUS requires dedicated studies to elucidate its risk factors and natural history. Our analysis of 357 patients with CCUS investigated the interplay between clonality, cytopenia, and prognosis. Multivariate analysis identified 3 key adverse prognostic factors: the presence of splicing mutation(s) (score = 2 points), platelet count of <100 × 109/L (score = 2.5), and ≥2 mutations (score = 3). Variable scores were based on the coefficients from the Cox proportional hazards model. This led to the development of the clonal cytopenia risk score (CCRS), which stratified patients into low- (score of <2.5 points), intermediate- (score of 2.5 to <5), and high-risk (score of ≥5) groups. The CCRS effectively predicted 2-year cumulative incidence of MN for low- (6.4%), intermediate- (14.1%), and high-risk (37.2%) groups, respectively, by the Gray test (P < .0001). We further validated the CCRS by applying it to an independent CCUS cohort of 104 patients, demonstrating a c-index of 0.64 (P = .005) in stratifying the cumulative incidence of MN. Our study underscores the importance of integrating clinical and molecular data to assess the risk of CCUS progression, making the CCRS a valuable tool that is practical and easily calculable. These findings are clinically relevant, shaping the management strategies for CCUS and informing future clinical trial designs. © 2024 American Society of Hematology
Keywords: adult; aged; aged, 80 and over; middle aged; major clinical study; somatic mutation; mutation; clinical trial; allele; risk factors; prediction; risk factor; risk assessment; proportional hazards model; clonal variation; multicenter study; scoring system; multivariate analysis; cytopenia; platelet count; procedures; clonal hematopoiesis; very elderly; humans; prognosis; human; male; female; article; clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential; clonal cytopenia; clonal cytopenia risk score
Journal Title: Blood
Volume: 144
Issue: 19
ISSN: 0006-4971
Publisher: American Society of Hematology  
Date Published: 2024-11-07
Start Page: 2033
End Page: 2044
Language: English
DOI: 10.1182/blood.2024024756
PUBMED: 38996210
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC11561536
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors