Best patient care practices for administering PSMA-targeted radiopharmaceutical therapy Review


Authors: Calais, J.; Morris, M. J.; Kendi, A. T.; Kalebasty, A. R.; Tutrone, R.; Anderson, M. J.; Sartor, O.
Review Title: Best patient care practices for administering PSMA-targeted radiopharmaceutical therapy
Abstract: Optimal patient management protocols for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) are poorly defined and even further complexified with new therapy approvals, such as radiopharmaceuticals. The prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)–targeted agent 177Lu vipivotide tetraxetan ([177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617), approved after the phase III VISION study, presents physicians with additional aspects of patient management, including specific adverse event (AE) monitoring and management, as well as radiation safety. Drawing on our experience as VISION study investigators, here we provide guidance on best practices for delivering PSMA-targeted radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT) to patients with mCRPC. After a comprehensive review of published evidence and guidelines on RPT management in prostate cancer, we identified educational gaps in managing the radiation safety and AEs associated with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617. Our results showed that providing sufficient education on AEs (e.g., fatigue and dry mouth) and radiation safety principles is key to effective delivery and management of patient expectations. Patient counseling by health care professionals, across disciplines, is a cornerstone of optimal patient management during PSMA-targeted RPT. Multidisciplinary collaboration is crucial, and physicians must adhere to radiation safety protocols and counsel patients on radiation safety considerations. Treatment with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 is generally well tolerated; however, additional interventions may be required, such as dosing modification, medications, or transfusions. Urinary incontinence can be challenging in the context of radiation safety. Multidisciplinary collaboration between medical oncologists and nuclear medicine teams ensures that patients are monitored and managed safely and efficiently. In clinical practice, the benefit-to-risk ratio should always be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. ß 2024 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
Keywords: medical oncologist; constipation; fatigue; neutropenia; bone metastasis; radiopharmaceuticals; clinical practice; metabolism; quality of life; anemia; bone marrow suppression; leukopenia; thrombocytopenia; vomiting; radiotherapy; methylphenidate; dexamethasone; radiation exposure; abdominal pain; prostate cancer; gastrointestinal toxicity; patient care; membrane antigen; prostate specific membrane antigen; urine incontinence; nephrostomy; radiopharmaceutical agent; xerostomia; health care personnel; nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide adenosine diphosphate ribosyltransferase inhibitor; nuclear medicine; salivary gland; radiation safety; dry eye; glutamate carboxypeptidase ii; antigens, surface; hydronephrosis; castration resistant prostate cancer; multidisciplinary management; molecularly targeted therapy; adverse event; adverse events; molecular targeted therapy; urinary tract obstruction; prostate-specific membrane antigen; metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer; humans; human; male; article; prostatic neoplasms, castration-resistant; radiopharmaceutical therapy; metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer; multidisciplinary team; folh1 protein, human; vipivotide tetraxetan lutetium lu 177
Journal Title: Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Volume: 65
Issue: 11
ISSN: 0161-5505
Publisher: Society of Nuclear Medicine  
Date Published: 2024-11-01
Start Page: 1666
End Page: 1671
Language: English
DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.268363
PUBMED: 39362764
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC11533911
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Michael Morris
    578 Morris