Niraparib first-line maintenance therapy in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer: Final overall survival results from the PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 trial Journal Article


Authors: Monk, B. J.; Barretina-Ginesta, M. P.; Pothuri, B.; Vergote, I.; Graybill, W.; Mirza, M. R.; McCormick, C. C.; Lorusso, D.; Moore, R. G.; Freyer, G.; O'Cearbhaill, R. E.; Heitz, F.; O'Malley, D. M.; Redondo, A.; Shahin, M. S.; Vulsteke, C.; Bradley, W. H.; Haslund, C. A.; Chase, D. M.; Pisano, C.; Holman, L. L.; Pérez, M. J. R.; DiSilvestro, P.; Gaba, L.; Herzog, T. J.; Bruchim, I.; Compton, N.; Shtessel, L.; Malinowska, I. A.; González-Martín, A.
Article Title: Niraparib first-line maintenance therapy in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer: Final overall survival results from the PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 trial
Abstract: Background: The phase III PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 trial met its primary endpoint. Niraparib first-line maintenance significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) among patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer that responded to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, regardless of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) status. Final overall survival (OS) results are reported. Patients and methods: Patients were randomized 2:1 to niraparib or placebo, stratified by response to first-line treatment, receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and tumor HRD status. After reaching 60% target maturity, OS was evaluated via a stratified log-rank test using randomization stratification factors and summarized using Kaplan–Meier methodology. OS testing was hierarchical [overall population first, then the homologous recombination-deficient (HRd) population]. Other secondary outcomes and long-term safety were assessed; an updated, ad hoc analysis of investigator-assessed PFS was also conducted (cut-off date, 8 April 2024). Results: The median follow-up was 73.9 months. In the overall population, the OS hazard ratio was 1.01 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84-1.23; P = 0.8834] for niraparib (n = 487) versus placebo (n = 246). In the HRd (n = 373) and homologous recombination-proficient (n = 249) populations, the OS hazard ratios were 0.95 (95% CI 0.70-1.29) and 0.93 (95% CI 0.69-1.26), respectively. Subsequent poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor therapy was received by 11.7% and 15.8% of niraparib patients and 37.8% and 48.4% of placebo patients in the overall and HRd populations, respectively. The 5-year PFS rate numerically favored niraparib in the overall (niraparib, 22%; placebo, 12%) and HRd populations (niraparib, 35%; placebo, 16%). Myelodysplastic syndromes/acute myeloid leukemia incidence was <2.5% (niraparib, 2.3%; placebo, 1.6%). No new safety signals were observed. Conclusions: In patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer at high risk of recurrence, there was no difference in OS between treatment arms. In the HRd population, patients alive at 5 years were two times as likely to be progression free with niraparib treatment than placebo. Long-term safety remained consistent with the established niraparib safety profile. © 2024 The Author(s)
Keywords: overall survival; ovarian cancer; maintenance; parp inhibitor; niraparib
Journal Title: Annals of Oncology
Volume: 35
Issue: 11
ISSN: 0923-7534
Publisher: Oxford University Press  
Date Published: 2024-11-01
Start Page: 981
End Page: 992
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2024.08.2241
PUBMED: 39284381
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC11934258
DOI/URL:
Notes: The MSK Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA008748) is acknowledge in the PDF -- Corresponding authors is MSK author: Bradley J. Monk -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors