Imlunestrant, an oral selective estrogen receptor degrader, as monotherapy and combined with abemaciclib, in recurrent/advanced ER-positive endometrioid endometrial cancer: Results from the phase 1a/1b EMBER study Journal Article


Authors: Yonemori, K.; Boni, V.; Min, K. G.; Meniawy, T. M.; Lombard, J.; Kaufman, P. A.; Richardson, D. L.; Bender, L.; Okera, M.; Matsumoto, K.; Giridhar, K. V.; García-Sáenz, J. A.; Prenen, H.; de Speville Uribe, B. D.; Dizon, D. S.; Garcia-Corbacho, J.; Van Nieuwenhuysen, E.; Li, Y.; Estrem, S. T.; Nguyen, B.; Bacchion, F.; Ismail-Khan, R.; Jhaveri, K.; Banda, K.
Article Title: Imlunestrant, an oral selective estrogen receptor degrader, as monotherapy and combined with abemaciclib, in recurrent/advanced ER-positive endometrioid endometrial cancer: Results from the phase 1a/1b EMBER study
Abstract: Objective: Imlunestrant is a next-generation oral selective estrogen receptor degrader designed to deliver continuous estrogen receptor (ER) target inhibition. EMBER is a phase 1a/b trial of imlunestrant, as monotherapy and combined with targeted therapy, in patients with ER+ advanced breast cancer or endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC). This report focuses on patients with ER+ EEC. Methods: EMBER used an i3 + 3 dose-escalation design to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) followed by dose-expansion cohorts (1:1 randomization): imlunestrant monotherapy and imlunestrant plus abemaciclib (150 mg twice daily). Eligible patients had measurable disease and progression or recurrence after platinum-containing chemotherapy. Prior fulvestrant or aromatase inhibitor was not allowed. Secondary endpoints included safety, pharmacokinetics and antitumor activity. Results: In total, 72 patients with a median of 2 prior anticancer therapies were treated. Among the 39 patients who received imlunestrant (400 mg [RP2D], n = 33; 800 mg, n = 6), the most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were grade 1–2 nausea (35.9 %), diarrhea (25.6 %), urinary tract infection (25.6 %), and abdominal pain (20.5 %). Overall response rate (ORR) was 10.3 %, clinical benefit rate (CBR) was 33.3 %, and median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 3.8 months (95 % CI, 1.8–6.7). Among the 33 patients who received imlunestrant (400 mg [RP2D], n = 29; 800 mg, n = 4) plus abemaciclib, the most common TEAEs were diarrhea (87.9 %), nausea (66.7 %), fatigue (48.5 %), and anemia (45.5 %). ORR was 18.2 %, CBR was 42.4 %, and mPFS was 6.8 months (95 % CI, 2.1–12). Conclusion: Imlunestrant, as monotherapy and combined with abemaciclib, has a manageable safety profile with preliminary evidence of antitumor activity in patients with ER+ EEC. © 2024
Keywords: uterine cancer; cdk4/6 inhibitors; serd
Journal Title: Gynecologic Oncology
Volume: 191
ISSN: 0090-8258
Publisher: Elsevier Inc.  
Date Published: 2024-12-01
Start Page: 172
End Page: 181
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.10.006
PROVIDER: scopus
PUBMED: 39442371
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article-- MSK Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA008748) acknowledged in PDF -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Komal Lachhman Jhaveri
    201 Jhaveri