Screening for health-related social needs and financial toxicity among patients with cancer treated with radiation therapy: Findings from a quality improvement project Journal Article
| Authors: | Thom, B.; Aviki, E. M.; Lapen, K.; Thompson, T.; Chino, F. |
| Article Title: | Screening for health-related social needs and financial toxicity among patients with cancer treated with radiation therapy: Findings from a quality improvement project |
| Abstract: | Introduction: Financial toxicity is common among patients with cancer, as are co-occurring health-related social risks (HRSRs). There is limited evidence to support best practices in screening for HRSRs and financial toxicity in the cancer context. This analysis sought to understand variations of identified needs based on treatment course using data from a large screening program. Methods: This 2022 to 2023 screening quality improvement program included four services (breast, gastrointestinal, gynecologic, thoracic) at an urban comprehensive cancer center. The Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity measured financial toxicity. Patients completed an HRSR checklist documenting food, housing, medication, or transportation insecurity and financial borrowing practices. Differences were evaluated by treatment course (radiation therapy [RT] versus other treatment and RT plus chemotherapy versus other treatment). Results: Screening surveys were sent to 70,983 unique patients; 38,249 completed a screening survey (54% response rate). Of responders, 4% (n = 1,686) underwent RT in the 120 days before their survey, and 3% (n = 1,033) received RT in combination with chemotherapy. Overall, patients receiving RT had lower unadjusted Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity scores, indicating worse financial toxicity. The proportion of patients receiving RT reporting unmet transportation (15% versus 12%, P < .001) and food (13% versus 11%, P = .02) needs was significantly higher than for patients not receiving RT. More patients receiving RT borrowed money than did patients not receiving RT (17% versus 15%, P = .02). In multivariable models, RT (alone or in combination) was associated with worse financial toxicity and transportation difficulties. Conclusions: Screening for financial toxicity and HRSR is possible at a large cancer center. Patients receiving RT have higher transportation insecurity and worse financial toxicity compared with those receiving other treatments. Tailored intervention throughout the treatment trajectory is essential. © 2024 |
| Keywords: | adult; controlled study; aged; middle aged; major clinical study; cancer patient; cancer radiotherapy; antineoplastic agent; neoplasm; neoplasms; breast cancer; radiotherapy; cohort analysis; mass screening; retrospective study; economics; questionnaire; cancer center; total quality management; screening; needs assessment; chemoradiotherapy; quality improvement; gastrointestinal cancer; adverse event; female genital tract cancer; checklist; money; humans; human; male; female; article; food insecurity; social needs; financial toxicity; surveys and questionnaires; malignant neoplasm; financial distress; thoracic cancer; traffic and transport; urban hospital; housing instability; health-related social risk |
| Journal Title: | Journal of the American College of Radiology |
| Volume: | 21 |
| Issue: | 9 |
| ISSN: | 1546-1440 |
| Publisher: | Elsevier Science, Inc. |
| Date Published: | 2024-09-01 |
| Start Page: | 1352 |
| End Page: | 1361 |
| Language: | English |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.jacr.2024.07.001 |
| PUBMED: | 38971414 |
| PROVIDER: | scopus |
| DOI/URL: | |
| Notes: | The MSK Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA008748) is acknowledged in the PDF -- Source: Scopus |
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
Related MSK Work