Intrapatient variation in PD-L1 expression and tumor mutational burden and the impact on outcomes to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer Journal Article


Authors: Di Federico, A.; Alden, S. L.; Smithy, J. W.; Ricciuti, B.; Alessi, J. V.; Wang, X.; Pecci, F.; Lamberti, G.; Gandhi, M. M.; Vaz, V. R.; Spurr, L. F.; Sholl, L. M.; Pfaff, K. L.; Rodig, S. J.; Li, Y. Y.; Cherniack, A. D.; Nishino, M.; Johnson, B. E.; Awad, M. M.
Article Title: Intrapatient variation in PD-L1 expression and tumor mutational burden and the impact on outcomes to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer
Abstract: Background: Programmed death receptor ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) and tumor mutational burden (TMB) are key predictive biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) efficacy in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Data on their variation across multiple samples are limited. Patients and methods: Patients with NSCLC and multiple PD-L1 TPS and/or TMB assessments were included. Clinicopathologic and genomic data were analyzed according to PD-L1 and TMB variation. Results: In total, 402 PD-L1 sample pairs and 413 TMB sample pairs were included. Concordance between pairs was moderate for PD-L1 (ρ = 0.53, P < 0.0001) and high for TMB (ρ = 0.80, P < 0.0001). Shorter time between biopsies correlated with higher concordance in PD-L1, but not in TMB. Major increases (ΔTPS ≥ +50%) and decreases (ΔTPS ≤ −50%) in PD-L1 were observed in 9.7% and 8.0% of cases, respectively. PD-L1, but not TMB, decreased with intervening ICI (P = 0.02). Acquired copy number loss of CD274, PDCD1LG2, and JAK2 were associated with major decrease in PD-L1 (q < 0.05). Among patients with multiple PD-L1 assessments before ICI, cases where all samples had a PD-L1 ≥1%, compared to cases with at least one sample with PD-L1 <1% and another with PD-L1 ≥1%, achieved improved objective response rate and progression-free survival (PFS). Among patients with at least one PD-L1 <1% and one ≥1% before ICI, cases where the most proximal sample was PD-L1 ≥1% had longer median PFS compared to cases where the most proximal PD-L1 was <1%. Among patients with multiple TMB assessments before ICI, patients with a TMB ≥10 mut/Mb based on the most recent assessment, as compared to those with a TMB <10 mut/Mb, achieved improved PFS and overall survival to ICI; instead, no differences were observed when patients were categorized using the oldest TMB assessment. Conclusions: Despite intrapatient concordance in PD-L1 and TMB, variation in these biomarkers can influence ICI outcomes, warranting consideration for reassessment before ICI initiation when feasible. © 2024 European Society for Medical Oncology
Keywords: adult; controlled study; human tissue; protein expression; treatment response; aged; aged, 80 and over; middle aged; major clinical study; overall survival; genetics; mutation; janus kinase 2; clinical feature; histopathology; mortality; drug efficacy; cancer patient; outcome assessment; protein analysis; metabolism; progression free survival; carcinoma, non-small-cell lung; lung neoplasms; cohort analysis; pathology; tumor marker; lung tumor; immunology; immunotherapy; drug therapy; lung biopsy; non-small-cell lung cancer; programmed death 1 ligand 1; non small cell lung cancer; progression-free survival; copy number variation; pd-l1; oncological parameters; immune checkpoint inhibitor; very elderly; humans; prognosis; human; male; female; article; programmed death 1 ligand 2; immune checkpoint inhibitors; biomarkers, tumor; oncogenomics; cd274 protein, human; tumor genomics; b7-h1 antigen; tumor mutational burden; tmb; tumor proportion score; checkpoint inhibitor therapy; variations
Journal Title: Annals of Oncology
Volume: 35
Issue: 10
ISSN: 0923-7534
Publisher: Oxford University Press  
Date Published: 2024-10-01
Start Page: 902
End Page: 913
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2024.06.014
PUBMED: 38950679
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. James William Smithy
    28 Smithy