Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis Review


Authors: Viani, G. A.; Gouveia, A. G.; Louie, A. V.; Arcidiacono, F.; Simone, C. B. 2nd; Tsakiridis, T.; Carolina Hamamura, A.; Anselmo, P.; Moraes, F. Y.
Review Title: Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract: Introduction: To evaluate the feasibility, efficacy and safety of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) to the primary tumor and lymph nodes in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) who are ineligible for or refused concomitant chemoradiation. Materials and Methods: In accordance with the PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines, a systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted. The study included reports that assessed the outcomes of SABR treatment in patients with LA-NSCLC. Studies evaluating SBRT as a boost following primary radiotherapy were excluded. The primary outcomes measured were local control (LC) and overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoint was the incidence of severe toxicity (grades 3–5). A meta-regression analysis was performed to explore the relationship between LC, OS, and severe toxicity. The Biologically Effective Dose (BED) was analyzed as a continuous variable. Statistical significance was defined as a p-value < 0.05. Results: A total of seven studies (3 prospective and 4 retrospective studies) involving 268 patients (SBRT to primary and lymph nodes) were included in the analysis. The pooled 1-year LC rate was 80 % (95 % CI: 63–94 %), and the factors significantly associated with LC were BEDGy10 (p = 0.005) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.005). The 1-year and 2-year OS rates were 74 % (95 % CI: 58–90 %) and 55 % (95 % CI: 34–76 %), respectively. Meta-regression analysis indicated a linear relationship between OS and LC, with a 0.7 % increase in OS for each 1 % improvement in LC (p = 0.005). The pooled rate of grade 3 acute toxicity was 5 % (95 % CI: 1–10 %), and the rate of grade 5 toxicity was 1.7 % (95 % CI: 0–3 %). Conclusion: Promising results (LC and OS) with limited toxicity (feasibility) using SABR in LA-NSCLC warrant further research, emphasizing the need for larger, well-designed trials for further validation of the approach. © 2024
Keywords: adult; cancer survival; aged; primary tumor; overall survival; cancer patient; cancer radiotherapy; follow up; histology; feasibility study; systematic review; lymph node; local control; locally advanced; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; cancer control; toxicity; acute toxicity; stereotactic body radiation therapy; meta analysis; chemoradiotherapy; meta-analysis; volumetric modulated arc therapy; non small cell lung cancer; clinical outcome; planning target volume; human; male; female; article; non-small cell lung cancer (nsclc); stereotactic body radiotherapy (sbrt); stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (sabr)
Journal Title: Radiotherapy and Oncology
Volume: 201
ISSN: 0167-8140
Publisher: Elsevier Inc.  
Date Published: 2024-12-01
Start Page: 110439
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110439
PUBMED: 39032835
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Charles Brian Simone
    190 Simone