Implementing patient-centered outcomes research institute stakeholder engagement principles in models of palliative care delivery and advance care planning research Journal Article


Authors: Walling, A. M.; Verma, M.; Grudzen, C. R.; Enguidanos, S.; Barrett, N. J.; Johnson, K. S.; Combe, A. K.; Johnston, F. M.; Greer, J. A.
Article Title: Implementing patient-centered outcomes research institute stakeholder engagement principles in models of palliative care delivery and advance care planning research
Abstract: Background: Given the many challenges of conducting research that addresses the palliative and end-of-life care needs of patients with serious illnesses, stakeholder engagement starting from the moment of study conceptualization and design is critical to ensure successful participant recruitment, data collection, intervention delivery, data analysis, and dissemination. Methods: Guided by a conceptual model published by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) entitled, “Measuring What Matters for Advancing the Science and Practice of Engagement”14 and with the support of a PCORI Engagement Officer, representatives from 9 PCORI-funded study teams formed a working group to survey team members and review, outline, and describe key lessons learned and best practices for promoting stakeholder engagement in palliative care research. Results: Almost all study teams engaged with patients/caregivers, clinicians, researchers, and health care system experts as stakeholder partners. About half the teams also included payers and training institutions as part of their stakeholder advisors as well as a range of content experts. Study teams relied on a variety of support structures and resources, and they employed 10 distinct methods for maintaining engagement. All engagement methods were generally considered to be effective by teams who used the method, though there was some variability in team-rated engagement quality of each method. Nine barriers to stakeholder engagement were identified across the 9 studies as well as 9 strategies (or facilitators) to overcome these barriers. We share examples of how stakeholder engagement impacted studies in all phases, including the preparatory phase, study initiation phase, execution phase, and data analysis/dissemination phase. Conclusions: Teams utilized a variety of resources and support structures as well as capitalized on multiple engagement methods for fostering stakeholder engagement, resulting in a high level of collaboration and integration. Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Keywords: outcome assessment; organization and management; palliative care; palliative therapy; data analysis; patient-centered care; outcomes research; health care system; caregiver; terminal care; patient outcome assessment; clinician; advance care planning; conceptual model; humans; human; article; best practice; stakeholder participation; stakeholder engagement; person centered care
Journal Title: Medical Care
Volume: 62
Issue: 10
ISSN: 0025-7079
Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins  
Date Published: 2024-10-01
Start Page: 693
End Page: 700
Language: English
DOI: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000002025
PUBMED: 39245817
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC11373890
DOI/URL:
Notes: The MSK Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA008748) is acknowledge in the PDF -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Corita Reilley Grudzen
    31 Grudzen