Survival associated with the use of sentinel lymph node in addition to lymphadenectomy in early-stage cervical cancer treated with surgery alone: A sub-analysis of the Surveillance in Cervical CANcer (SCCAN) collaborative study Journal Article


Authors: Bizzarri, N.; Querleu, D.; Ramirez, P. T.; Dostálek, L.; van Lonkhuijzen, L. R. W.; Giannarelli, D.; Lopez, A.; Salehi, S.; Ayhan, A.; Kim, S. H.; Isla Ortiz, D.; Klat, J.; Landoni, F.; Pareja, R.; Manchanda, R.; Kosťun, J.; Meydanli, M. M.; Odetto, D.; Laky, R.; Zapardiel, I.; Weinberger, V.; Dos Reis, R.; Pedone Anchora, L.; Amaro, K.; Akilli, H.; Abu-Rustum, N. R.; Salcedo-Hernández, R. A.; Javůrková, V.; Mom, C. H.; Falconer, H.; Scambia, G.; Cibula, D.
Article Title: Survival associated with the use of sentinel lymph node in addition to lymphadenectomy in early-stage cervical cancer treated with surgery alone: A sub-analysis of the Surveillance in Cervical CANcer (SCCAN) collaborative study
Abstract: Aim: The aim of this study was to assess whether the use of sentinel lymph node (SLN) in addition to lymphadenectomy was associated with survival benefit in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Methods: International, multicenter, retrospective study. Inclusion criteria: cervical cancer treated between 01/2007 and 12/2016 by surgery only; squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, adenosquamous carcinoma, FIGO 2009 stage IB1-IIA2, negative surgical margins, and laparotomy approach. Patients undergoing neo-adjuvant and/or adjuvant treatment and/or with positive para-aortic lymph nodes, were excluded. Women with positive pelvic nodes who refused adjuvant treatment, were included. Lymph node assessment was performed by SLN (with ultrastaging protocol) plus pelvic lymphadenectomy (‘SLN’ group) or pelvic lymphadenectomy alone (‘non-SLN’ group). Results: 1083 patients were included: 300 (27.7 %) in SLN and 783 (72.3 %) in non-SLN group. 77 (7.1 %) patients had recurrence (N = 11, 3.7 % SLN versus N = 66, 8.4 % non-SLN, p = 0.005) and 34 (3.1 %) (N = 4, 1.3 % SLN versus N = 30, 3.8 % non-SLN, p = 0.033) died. SLN group had better 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) (96.0 %,95 %CI:93.5–98.5 versus 92.0 %,95 %CI:90.0–94.0; p = 0.024). No 5-year overall survival (OS) difference was shown (98.4 %,95 %CI:96.8–99.9 versus 96.8 %,95 %CI:95.4–98.2; p = 0.160). SLN biopsy and lower stage were independent factors associated with improved DFS (HR:0.505,95 %CI:0.266–0.959, p = 0.037 and HR:2.703,95 %CI:1.389–5.261, p = 0.003, respectively). Incidence of pelvic central recurrences was higher in the non-SLN group (1.7 % versus 4.5 %, p = 0.039). Conclusion: Adding SLN biopsy to pelvic lymphadenectomy was associated with lower recurrence and death rate and improved 5-year DFS. This might be explained by the lower rate of missed nodal metastasis thanks to the use of SLN ultrastaging. SLN biopsy should be recommended in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. © 2024 The Authors
Keywords: survival; adult; cancer survival; human tissue; middle aged; major clinical study; overall survival; cancer recurrence; disease free survival; cancer staging; follow up; lymph node metastasis; lymph node dissection; laparotomy; sentinel lymph node; sentinel lymph node biopsy; lymphadenectomy; computer assisted tomography; pelvis lymphadenectomy; cohort analysis; recurrence; retrospective study; early cancer; uterine cervix cancer; recurrent disease; adenosquamous carcinoma; predictive value; radical hysterectomy; cervical cancer; surgical margin; indocyanine green; uterine cervix adenocarcinoma; ultrastaging; human; female; article; positron emission tomography-computed tomography; cervical squamous cell carcinoma; cervicotomy
Journal Title: European Journal of Cancer
Volume: 211
ISSN: 0959-8049
Publisher: Elsevier Inc.  
Date Published: 2024-11-01
Start Page: 114310
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.114310
PROVIDER: scopus
PUBMED: 39270379
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Sarah H Kim
    44 Kim