The impact of previous therapy on overall-survival in registration clinical trials for 1st line metastatic breast cancer a systemic review Journal Article


Authors: Remilah, A. A.; Krayim, B.; Amir, E.; Tibau, A.; Robson, M. E.; Abuhadra, N.; Chen, Y.; Shepshelovich, D.; Goldvaser, H.
Article Title: The impact of previous therapy on overall-survival in registration clinical trials for 1st line metastatic breast cancer a systemic review
Abstract: Aim: To explore the impact of previous treatment on the efficacy of investigational new drugs in registration trials for 1st line metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Methods: Thirteen US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved indications for 1st line MBC between 1/2000–12/2023 were identified and their supporting publications were searched in the ClinicalTrials.gov and Google Scholar. Where available, hazard ratios (HRs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) for overall-survival (OS) were pooled into meta-analysis and the difference in the magnitude of OS benefit between treatment naïve and previously treated patients was analyzed. Results: There was no difference in the magnitude of OS benefit between treatment-naïve and previously treated patients (HR=0.72 versus 0.80,p for difference=0.25). In indications for triple-negative BC, treatment-naïve patients had higher magnitude of OS benefit compared to previously treated patients (HR=0.53 versus 0.81,p=0.03). In indications for luminal disease, the magnitude of benefit was comparable between the subgroups. Conclusions: In trials supporting 1st line therapy for TNBC the magnitude of benefit is significantly higher in treatment naïve compared to previously treated patients. Our findings may represent a previously unrecognized bias, potentially over-estimating the benefit of triple-negative BC new drugs. © 2024 Elsevier B.V.
Keywords: cancer chemotherapy; overall survival; review; bevacizumab; drug efficacy; drug approval; united states; gemcitabine; paclitaxel; comparative study; carboplatin; aromatase inhibitor; publication; docetaxel; systematic review; tamoxifen; letrozole; trastuzumab; anastrozole; metastatic breast cancer; lapatinib; fulvestrant; pertuzumab; clinical trial (topic); triple negative breast cancer; de-novo; first-line treatment; human; palbociclib; pembrolizumab; abemaciclib; ribociclib; atezolizumab; treatment-naïve; registration trials
Journal Title: Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology
Volume: 202
ISSN: 1040-8428
Publisher: Elsevier Science, Inc.  
Date Published: 2024-10-01
Start Page: 104455
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104455
PUBMED: 39067779
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: Review -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Mark E Robson
    676 Robson
  2. Yuan Chen
    38 Chen