Early on-treatment assessment of T cells, cytokines, and tumor DNA with adaptively dosed nivolumab + ipilimumab: Final results from the phase 2 ADAPT-IT study Journal Article


Authors: Smithy, J. W.; Kalvin, H. L.; Ehrich, F. D.; Shah, R.; Adamow, M.; Raber, V.; Maher, C. A.; Kleman, J.; McIntyre, D. A. G.; Shoushtari, A. N.; Warner, A. B.; Callahan, M. K.; Momtaz, P.; Eton, O.; Nair, S.; Wolchok, J. D.; Chapman, P. B.; Berger, M. F.; Panageas, K. S.; Postow, M. A.
Article Title: Early on-treatment assessment of T cells, cytokines, and tumor DNA with adaptively dosed nivolumab + ipilimumab: Final results from the phase 2 ADAPT-IT study
Abstract: Purpose: The Adaptively Dosed ImmunoTherapy Trial (ADAPT-IT;NCT03122522) investigated adaptive ipilimumab discontinuation in melanoma based on early radiographic assessment. Initial findings indicated similar effectiveness compared with conventional nivolumab-ipilimumab (nivo-ipi). Exploratory biomarker analyses and final clinical results are now reported. Patients and Methods: Patients with unresectable melanoma received two doses of nivo-ipi. Radiographic assessment at Week 6 informed continuation of ipilimumab before nivolumab maintenance. The primary endpoint was overall response rate at Week 12. Plasma was assayed for circulating tumor DNA and 10 cytokines using a multiplex immunoassay. Flow cytometry of peripheral blood mononuclear cells was performed with an 11-color panel. Results: Among the treated patients, expansion of proliferating T-cell populations was observed in responders and nonresponders. Baseline IL6 levels were low in patients achieving an objective radiographic response (median 1.30 vs. 2.86 pg/mL; P 1⁄4 0.025). High baseline IL6 levels were associated with short progression-free survival [PFS; HR 1⁄4 1.24, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.01–1.52; P 1⁄4 0.041]. At Week 6, patients with response had lower average tumor variant allele fractions than nonresponders (median 0.000 vs. 0.019; P 1⁄4 0.014). Greater increases in average variant allele fractions from baseline to Week 6 correlated with short PFS (HR 1⁄4 1.11, 95% CI, 1.01–1.21; P 1⁄4 0.023). Week 12 overall response rate was 47% (95% CI, 35%–59%) with a median follow-up of 34 months among survivors. Median PFS was 21 months (95% CI, 10–not reached); 76% of responses (95% CI, 64%–91%) persisted at 36 months. Conclusions: Adaptively dosed nivo-ipi responses are durable and resemble historical data for conventional nivo-ipi. Baseline IL6 and circulating tumor DNA changes during treatment warrant further study as biomarkers of nivo-ipi response. ©2024 American Association for Cancer Research.
Keywords: adult; aged; aged, 80 and over; middle aged; unclassified drug; major clinical study; overall survival; clinical trial; mortality; drug efficacy; flow cytometry; outcome assessment; follow up; antineoplastic agent; t lymphocyte; t-lymphocytes; metabolism; allele; interleukin 2; ipilimumab; melanoma; progression free survival; phase 2 clinical trial; antineoplastic combined chemotherapy protocols; interleukin 13; interleukin 4; interleukin 8; antineoplastic activity; pathology; tumor marker; cytokine; immunology; cytokines; dna; immune response; gamma interferon; blood sampling; multicenter study; dna, neoplasm; interleukin 6; immunoassay; interleukin 17; drug therapy; interleukin 12; tumor necrosis factor; tumor microenvironment; phase 2 clinical trial (topic); high throughput sequencing; nivolumab; very elderly; humans; human; male; female; article; circulating tumor dna; biomarkers, tumor; tumor dna
Journal Title: Clinical Cancer Research
Volume: 30
Issue: 16
ISSN: 1078-0432
Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research  
Date Published: 2024-08-15
Start Page: 3407
End Page: 3415
Language: English
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.Ccr-23-3643
PUBMED: 38767650
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC11357703
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- MSK Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA008748) acknowledged in PubMed and PDF -- MSK corresponding author is James W. Smithy -- MSK author Debra McIntyre's first name is spelled 'Deborah' on the original publication -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Jedd D Wolchok
    905 Wolchok
  2. Michael Andrew Postow
    360 Postow
  3. Paul Chapman
    326 Chapman
  4. Margaret Kathleen Callahan
    196 Callahan
  5. Katherine S Panageas
    512 Panageas
  6. Michael Forman Berger
    764 Berger
  7. Matthew J Adamow
    24 Adamow
  8. Debra Alyssa Goldman
    157 Goldman
  9. Ronak Hasmukh Shah
    72 Shah
  10. Parisa   Momtaz
    54 Momtaz
  11. Colleen Anne Maher
    16 Maher
  12. James William Smithy
    28 Smithy
  13. Hannah Kalvin
    29 Kalvin
  14. Vladislav Raber
    3 Raber
  15. Fiona Donovan Ehrich
    10 Ehrich
  16. Jenna L Kleman
    2 Kleman