| Abstract: |
BaCKgroUNd: robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (rapN) has emerged as the preferred approach for T1 renal-cell-carcinoma. as new robotic platforms like hugo raS emerge, we seek to understand their potential in achieving similar rapN outcomes as the established da Vinci system. MeThodS: a prospective single-center comparative study was conducted, and 50 patients selected for rapN were enrolled (25 da Vinci Xi; 25 hugo raS). The choice of robotic system was based solely on hospital logistics criteria. Surgeries were performed by expert surgeons. demographic data, tumor characteristics, operative details and postoperative outcomes were collected. SpSS version 22.0 was used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: The average age of patients was 62.52±9.47 years, with no significant differences in median age, sex, and nephrometry scores between groups. Da Vinci group showed a significantly shorter docking time (12.56 vs. 20.08 min; p<0.01), while other intraoperative measures like console time and warm ischemia time were similar. The hugo raS group had a shorter renorraphy time (14.33 vs. 18.84 min; p=0.024). postoperative outcomes and surgical margin positivity showed no significant differences. Each group had one patient (4%) who developed major surgical complications (Clavien IIIa). Trifecta rates were comparable between both groups (Da Vinci 88% vs. Hugo RAS 84%; P=0.93). CONCLUSIONS: Initial findings suggest similar perioperative outcomes for RAPN when using Hugo RAS compared to the da Vinci system. Further research with long-term follow-up is necessary to evaluate oncological and functional outcomes. © 2024 Edizioni Minerva Medica. |
