A pre-operative scoring model to estimate the risk of blood transfusion over an ovarian cancer debulking surgery (BLOODS score): A Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Team Ovary study Journal Article


Authors: Kahn, R. M.; Boerner, T.; Kim, M.; Lam, C.; Gordhandas, S.; Yeoshoua, E.; Zhou, Q. C.; Iasonos, A.; Al-Niaimi, A.; Gardner, G. J.; Long Roche, K.; Sonoda, Y.; Zivanovic, O.; Grisham, R. N.; Abu-Rustum, N. R.; Chi, D. S.
Article Title: A pre-operative scoring model to estimate the risk of blood transfusion over an ovarian cancer debulking surgery (BLOODS score): A Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Team Ovary study
Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To develop a pre-operative tool to estimate the risk of peri-operative packed red blood cell transfusion in primary debulking surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed an institutional database to identify patients who underwent primary debulking surgery for ovarian cancer at a single center between January 1, 2001 and May 31, 2019. Receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated. Five-fold cross-validation was applied to the multivariate model. Significant variables were assigned a 'BLOODS' (BLood transfusion Over an Ovarian cancer Debulking Surgery) score of +1 if present. A total BLOODS score was calculated for each patient, and the odds of receiving a transfusion was determined for each score. RESULTS: Overall, 1566 patients met eligibility criteria; 800 (51%) underwent a peri-operative blood transfusion. Odds ratios (OR) were statistically significant for American Society of Anesthesiologists scores of 3 and 4 (OR 1.34, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.09 to 1.63), pre-operative levels of cancer antigen 125 (CA125) (OR 2.43, 95% CI 1.98 to 2.99), platelets (OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.45 to 1.74), obesity (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.96), presence of carcinomatosis (OR 2.45, 95% CI 1.93 to 3.11), bulky upper abdominal disease (OR 2.86, 95% CI 2.32 to 3.54), pre-operative serum albumin level (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.40), and pre-operative hemoglobin level (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.61). The corrected AUC was 0.748 (95% CI 0.693 to 0.804). BLOODS scores of 0 and 5 corresponded to 11% and 73% odds, respectively, of receiving a peri-operative blood transfusion. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a universal pre-operative scoring system, the BLOODS score, to help identify patients with ovarian cancer who would benefit from surgical planning and blood-saving techniques. The BLOODS score was directly proportional to the American Society of Anesthesiologists score, presence of upper abdominal disease, carcinomatosis, CA125 level, and platelets level. We believe this model can help physicians with surgical planning and can benefit patient outcomes. © IGCS and ESGO 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Keywords: adult; aged; middle aged; retrospective studies; ovarian cancer; cytoreductive surgery; ovarian neoplasms; pathology; retrospective study; risk assessment; blood; ovary tumor; blood transfusion; surgery; procedures; surgical oncology; humans; human; female; cytoreduction surgical procedures
Journal Title: International Journal of Gynecological Cancer
Volume: 34
Issue: 7
ISSN: 1048-891X
Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins  
Date Published: 2024-07-01
Start Page: 1051
End Page: 1059
Language: English
DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2024-005660
PUBMED: 38950927
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC11237961
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- MSK Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA008748) acknowledged in PubMed and PDF -- MSK corresponding author is Dennis Chi -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Ginger J Gardner
    271 Gardner
  2. Dennis S Chi
    710 Chi
  3. Yukio Sonoda
    473 Sonoda
  4. Oliver Zivanovic
    291 Zivanovic
  5. Qin Zhou
    255 Zhou
  6. Alexia Elia Iasonos
    364 Iasonos
  7. Rachel Nicole Grisham
    172 Grisham
  8. Thomas Boerner
    72 Boerner
  9. Ryan Matthew Kahn
    42 Kahn
  10. Clarissa Joyce Lam
    15 Lam