Current unmet needs in locally advanced (unresectable) or metastatic dedifferentiated liposarcoma, the relevance of progression-free survival as clinical endpoint, and expectations for future clinical trial design: An international Delphi consensus report Review


Authors: Schöffski, P.; Jones, R. L.; Agulnik, M.; Blay, J. Y.; Chalmers, A.; Italiano, A.; Pink, D.; Stacchiotti, S.; Valverde, C.; Vincenzi, B.; Wagner, M. J.; Maki, R.
Review Title: Current unmet needs in locally advanced (unresectable) or metastatic dedifferentiated liposarcoma, the relevance of progression-free survival as clinical endpoint, and expectations for future clinical trial design: An international Delphi consensus report
Abstract: Background: Locally advanced (unresectable) or metastatic dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) is a common presentation of liposarcoma. Despite established diagnostic and treatment guidelines for DDLPS, critical clinical gaps remain driven by diagnostic challenges, symptom burden and the lack of targeted, safe and effective treatments. The objective of this study was to gather expert opinions from Europe and the United States on the management, unmet needs and expectations for clinical trial design as well as the value of progression-free survival (PFS) in this disease. Other aims included raising awareness and educate key stakeholders across healthcare systems. Materials and methods: An international panel of 12 sarcoma key opinion leaders (KOLs) was recruited. The study consisted of two rounds of surveys with pre-defined statements. Experts scored each statement on a 9-point Likert scale. Consensus agreement was defined as ≥75% of experts scoring a statement with ≥7. Revised statements were discussed in a consensus meeting. Results: Consensus was reached on 43 of 55 pre-defined statements across disease burden, treatment paradigm, unmet needs, value of PFS and its association with overall survival (OS), and cross-over trial design. Twelve statements were deprioritised or merged with other statements. There were no statements where experts disagreed. Conclusion: This study constitutes the first international Delphi panel on DDLPS. It aimed to explore KOL perception of the disease burden and unmet need in DDLPS, the value of PFS, and its potential translation to OS benefit, as well as the relevance of a cross-over trial design for DDLPS therapies. Results indicate an alignment across Europe and the United States regarding DDLPS management, unmet needs, and expectations for clinical trials. Raising awareness of critical clinical gaps in relation to DDLPS can contribute to improving patient outcomes and supporting the development of innovative treatments. © 2024 The Authors
Keywords: adult; treatment outcome; overall survival; clinical trial; review; systemic therapy; consensus; metastasis; progression free survival; sarcoma; health care system; expectation; consensus development; delphi study; drug therapy; crossover procedure; awareness; therapy; liposarcoma; progression-free survival; clinical trial design; dedifferentiated liposarcoma; disease burden; symptom burden; human; female; likert scale; treatment guideline; unmet need
Journal Title: ESMO Open
Volume: 9
Issue: 7
ISSN: 2059-7029
Publisher: European Society for Medical Oncology  
Date Published: 2024-07-01
Start Page: 103487
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.103487
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC11261277
PUBMED: 38943735
DOI/URL:
Notes: Review -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Robert Maki
    240 Maki