A novel method for rapid estimation of active bone marrow dose for radiotherapy patients in epidemiological studies Journal Article


Authors: Yeom, Y. S.; Braunstein, L.; Morton, L. M.; Bolton, K. L.; Choi, J. W.; Choi, H. Y.; Greenstein, N.; Lee, C.
Article Title: A novel method for rapid estimation of active bone marrow dose for radiotherapy patients in epidemiological studies
Abstract: Background: In a dedicated effort to improve the assessment of clonal hematopoiesis (CH) and study leukemia risk following radiotherapy, we are developing a large-scale cohort study among cancer patients who received radiation. To that end, it will be critical to analyze dosimetric parameters of red bone marrow (ABM) exposure in relation to CH and its progression to myeloid neoplasms, requiring reconstruction method for ABM doses of a large-scale patients rapidly and accurately. Purpose: To support a large-scale cohort study on the assessment of clonal hematopoiesis and leukemia risk following radiotherapy, we present a new method for the rapid reconstruction of ABM doses of radiotherapy among cancer patients. Methods: The key idea of the presented method is to segment patient bones rapidly and automatically by matching a whole-body computational human phantom, in which the skeletal system is divided into 34 bone sites, to patient CT images via 3D skeletal registration. The automatic approach was used to segment site-specific bones for 40 radiotherapy patients. Also, we segmented the bones manually. The bones segmented both manually and automatically were then combined with the patient dose matrix calculated by the treatment planning system (TPS) to derive patient ABM dose. We evaluated the performance of the automatic method in geometric and dosimetric accuracy by comparison with the manual approach. Results: The pelvis showed the best geometric performance [volume overlap fraction (VOF): 52% (mean) with 23% (σ) and average distance (AD): 0.8 cm (mean) with 0.5 cm (σ)]. The pelvis also showed the best dosimetry performance [absorbed dose difference (ADD): 0.7 Gy (mean) with 1.0 Gy (σ)]. Some bones showed unsatisfactory performances such as the cervical vertebrae [ADD: 5.2 Gy (mean) with 10.8 Gy (σ)]. This impact on the total ABM dose, however, was not significant. An excellent agreement for the total ABM dose was indeed observed [ADD: 0.4 Gy (mean) with 0.4 Gy (σ)]. The computation time required for dose calculation using our method was robust (about one minute per patient). Conclusions: We confirmed that our method estimates ABM doses across treatment sites accurately, while providing high computational efficiency. The method will be used to reconstruct patient-specific ABM doses for dose-response assessment in a large cohort study. The method can also be applied to prospective dose calculation within a clinical TPS to support clinical decision making at the point of care. © 2024 The Authors. Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
Keywords: adult; clinical article; leukemia; humerus; cancer risk; cancer patient; cancer radiotherapy; radiation dose; pelvis; computer assisted tomography; cohort studies; bone marrow; radiotherapy dosage; radiotherapy; cohort analysis; tomography, x-ray computed; automation; radiation response; time factors; risk assessment; radiation dosage; blood; computerized tomography; dosimetry; geometry; bone; radiometry; radiotherapy planning, computer-assisted; phantoms, imaging; epidemiology; radiation dose distribution; femur; sternum; sacrum; diseases; performance; image reconstruction; tibia; image registration; mandible; ankle; clavicle; phantoms; image segmentation; skull; radius; epidemiologic studies; time factor; rib; procedures; cancer patients; lumbar vertebra; haematopoiesis; scapula; ulna; clonal hematopoiesis; absorbed dose; imaging phantom; humans; human; male; female; article; radiotherapy planning system; x-ray computed tomography; thoracic vertebra; cervical vertebra; large-scales; active bone marrow dose; computational human phantom; human phantoms; foot bone; hand bone
Journal Title: Medical Physics
Volume: 51
Issue: 6
ISSN: 0094-2405
Publisher: American Association of Physicists in Medicine  
Date Published: 2024-06-01
Start Page: 4472
End Page: 4481
Language: English
DOI: 10.1002/mp.17118
PUBMED: 38734989
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC12167658
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors