Effect of age on safety and efficacy of novel cancer drugs investigated in early-phase clinical trials Journal Article


Authors: Nicolò, E.; Gandini, S.; Giugliano, F.; Uliano, J.; D'Ecclesiis, O.; Morganti, S.; Ferraro, E.; Trapani, D.; Tarantino, P.; Zagami, P.; Boldrini, L.; Caramella, I.; Carnevale Schianca, A.; Cristofanilli, M.; Locatelli, M. A.; Esposito, A.; Belli, C.; Minchella, I.; Criscitiello, C.; Marra, A.; Curigliano, G.
Article Title: Effect of age on safety and efficacy of novel cancer drugs investigated in early-phase clinical trials
Abstract: Background: Elderly patients are underrepresented in clinical trials, particularly in early-phase studies. Our study assessed the safety and efficacy of novel anti-cancer treatments investigated in early-phase clinical trials, comparing outcomes between younger and elderly patients. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed data from patients enrolled in phase I/II trials at our center between January 2014 and April 2021. We evaluated clinicopathologic characteristics, toxicity, and clinical efficacy, categorizing patients into younger (≤ 65 years) and elderly (> 65 years) groups. Results: 419 patients were included with a median age of 56 years. Among these, 107 (26 %) were older than 65 years. Predominant cancers included breast (48 %), lung (10 %), and melanoma (5 %). Patients were treated in 64 trials, predominantly receiving immunotherapy-based (47 %) or targeted therapy-based (45 %) treatment. Elderly presented with poorer ECOG performance status (P = 0.001) and had fewer prior therapy lines (P = 0.01) than younger patients. Grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) were similar across age groups (31 % younger vs 33 % elderly; P = 0.7), including in combination therapy scenarios. However, elderly patients experienced more AEs with antibody-drug conjugates compared to younger counterparts (56 % vs 14 %, P = 0.036) and were more likely to discontinue treatment due to toxicity (15 % vs 7 %; P = 0.011). No significant age-related differences in response rates and survival outcomes were observed across treatment modalities, except for immunotherapy-based regimens for which elderly patients exhibited higher response rates, disease control rates, and prolonged progression-free survival. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that elderly exhibit comparable safety and efficacy outcomes to younger patients in early-phase clinical trials for new cancer drugs. This underscores the importance of including elderly patients in phase I/II trials to ensure the generalizability of study results and mitigate age-related disparities in cancer treatment access. © 2024 Elsevier Ltd
Keywords: survival; adult; cancer survival; controlled study; aged; major clinical study; clinical feature; drug efficacy; drug safety; drug withdrawal; neurotoxicity; antineoplastic agent; melanoma; progression free survival; breast cancer; blood toxicity; lung cancer; retrospective study; age; pneumonia; outcome; safety; disease control; elderly; solid tumors; electrolyte disturbance; phase i; clinical trial (topic); molecularly targeted therapy; phase 2 clinical trial (topic); phase 1 clinical trial (topic); clinical outcome; adverse events; cancer; human; male; female; article; malignant neoplasm; ecog performance status; early-phase clinical trial
Journal Title: European Journal of Cancer
Volume: 207
ISSN: 0959-8049
Publisher: Elsevier Inc.  
Date Published: 2024-08-01
Start Page: 114181
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2024.114181
PROVIDER: scopus
PUBMED: 38909537
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Emanuela Ferraro
    31 Ferraro