Treatment planning for MR-guided SBRT of pancreatic tumors on a 1.5 T MR-Linac: A global consensus protocol Journal Article


Authors: Grimbergen, G.; Eijkelenkamp, H.; Snoeren, L. M. W.; Bahij, R.; Bernchou, U.; van der Bijl, E.; Heerkens, H. D.; Binda, S.; Ng, S. S. W.; Bouchart, C.; Paquier, Z.; Brown, K.; Khor, R.; Chuter, R.; Freear, L.; Dunlop, A.; Mitchell, R. A.; Erickson, B. A.; Hall, W. A.; Godoy Scripes, P.; Tyagi, N.; de Leon, J.; Tran, C.; Oh, S.; Renz, P.; Shessel, A.; Taylor, E.; Intven, M. P. W.; Meijer, G. J.
Article Title: Treatment planning for MR-guided SBRT of pancreatic tumors on a 1.5 T MR-Linac: A global consensus protocol
Abstract: Background and purpose: Treatment planning for MR-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for pancreatic tumors can be challenging, leading to a wide variation of protocols and practices. This study aimed to harmonize treatment planning by developing a consensus planning protocol for MR-guided pancreas SBRT on a 1.5 T MR-Linac. Materials and methods: A consortium was founded of thirteen centers that treat pancreatic tumors on a 1.5 T MR-Linac. A phased planning exercise was conducted in which centers iteratively created treatment plans for two cases of pancreatic cancer. Each phase was followed by a meeting where the instructions for the next phase were determined. After three phases, a consensus protocol was reached. Results: In the benchmarking phase (phase I), substantial variation between the SBRT protocols became apparent (for example, the gross tumor volume (GTV) D99% ranged between 36.8 – 53.7 Gy for case 1, 22.6 – 35.5 Gy for case 2). The next phase involved planning according to the same basic dosimetric objectives, constraints, and planning margins (phase II), which led to a large degree of harmonization (GTV D99% range: 47.9–53.6 Gy for case 1, 33.9–36.6 Gy for case 2). In phase III, the final consensus protocol was formulated in a treatment planning system template and again used for treatment planning. This not only resulted in further dosimetric harmonization (GTV D99% range: 48.2–50.9 Gy for case 1, 33.5–36.0 Gy for case 2) but also in less variation of estimated treatment delivery times. Conclusion: A global consensus protocol has been developed for treatment planning for MR-guided pancreatic SBRT on a 1.5 T MR-Linac. Aside from harmonizing the large variation in the current clinical practice, this protocol can provide a starting point for centers that are planning to treat pancreatic tumors on MR-Linac systems. © 2024 The Author(s)
Keywords: treatment planning; pancreas cancer; radiation dose; nuclear magnetic resonance imaging; consensus; computer assisted tomography; tumor volume; benchmarking; pancreatic cancer; stereotactic body radiation therapy; cone beam computed tomography; gross tumor volume; dose volume histogram; planning target volume; human; article; consensus protocol; mr-guided sbrt
Journal Title: Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
Volume: 47
ISSN: 2405-6308
Publisher: Elsevier Inc.  
Date Published: 2024-07-01
Start Page: 100797
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100797
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC11145226
PUBMED: 38831754
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Neelam Tyagi
    151 Tyagi