Breast cancer presenting with intravascular tumor emboli in axillary soft tissue: Recurrence risk and radiation therapy outcomes Journal Article


Authors: Sarkar, R. R.; Lavery, J. A.; Zhang, Z.; Mueller, B. A.; Zinovoy, M.; Cuaron, J. J.; McCormick, B.; Khan, A. J.; Powell, S. N.; Wen, H. Y.; Braunstein, L. Z.
Article Title: Breast cancer presenting with intravascular tumor emboli in axillary soft tissue: Recurrence risk and radiation therapy outcomes
Abstract: Purpose: Intravascular tumor emboli in axillary soft tissue (ITE) is a rare pathologic finding in breast cancer and is associated with higher axillary nodal disease burden. The independent prognostic and predictive value of this entity is unknown, as is the role of radiation therapy for ITE. Methods and Materials: We analyzed a prospectively maintained database of breast cancer patients treated from 1992 to 2020. Patients with ITE were matched to those without (1:2) based on propensity scores to control for potential confounding factors. Locoregional (LRR) and distant recurrence (DR) were evaluated using competing risks methods accounting for death as a competing event. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were evaluated by Cox regression models. Among patients with ITE, we also evaluated whether RT improved outcomes. Results: Among 2377 total patients, 129 had ITE, of whom 126 were propensity score matched to 252 without ITE. Median follow-up from time of surgery was 5.5 years (IQR 2.3, 9.7). There were no statistically significant differences in the 5-year incidence of LRR between groups (5.4% [95% CI, 1.6%-13%] with ITE vs 10% [95% CI, 6.7%-15%] without, P = .53) or DR (24% [95% CI, 15% 35%] with ITE vs 21% [95% CI, 16%-27%] without, P = .51). Five-year OS and DFS did not differ between groups (P > .9 for both comparisons, patients with ITE vs without ITE). In analyzing the effect of RT among patients with ITE, receipt of RT was associated with significantly improved DFS (HR, 0.34, 95% CI, 0.12-0.93, P = .04). Conclusions: Patients with ITE do not exhibit significantly worse LRR, DR, DFS, or OS compared with a propensity-score-matched cohort without ITE. However, among patients with ITE, those who received RT demonstrated significantly improved DFS. Larger studies with longer follow-up are needed to evaluate the prognostic and predictive implications of ITE. © 2024 The Author(s)
Keywords: adult; cancer chemotherapy; cancer survival; controlled study; treatment outcome; aged; major clinical study; overall survival; cancer recurrence; cancer patient; cancer radiotherapy; comparative study; disease free survival; recurrence risk; follow up; antineoplastic agent; mastectomy; cohort analysis; data base; soft tissue; proportional hazards model; death; recurrent disease; fisher exact test; tumor embolism; rank sum test; predictive value; cumulative incidence; breast-conserving surgery; confounding variable; propensity score; cancer prognosis; invasive breast cancer; human; female; article
Journal Title: Advances in Radiation Oncology
Volume: 9
Issue: 7
ISSN: 2452-1094
Publisher: Elsevier Inc.  
Date Published: 2024-06-30
Start Page: 101508
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2024.101508
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC11127195
PUBMED: 38799109
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- MSKC Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA008748) acknowledged in PDF -- MSK corresponding author is Lior Braunstein -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Melissa Remis Zinovoy
    49 Zinovoy
  2. Zhigang Zhang
    427 Zhang
  3. Simon Nicholas Powell
    331 Powell
  4. Boris A Mueller
    104 Mueller
  5. Hannah Yong Wen
    301 Wen
  6. Beryl McCormick
    371 McCormick
  7. John Jacob Cuaron
    142 Cuaron
  8. Atif Jalees Khan
    152 Khan
  9. Jessica Ann Lavery
    79 Lavery
  10. Reith Roy Sarkar
    26 Sarkar