Immunochemotherapy plus lenalidomide for high-risk mantle cell lymphoma with measurable residual disease evaluation Journal Article


Authors: Epstein-Peterson, Z. D.; Drill, E.; Aypar, U.; Batlevi, C. L.; Caron, P.; Dogan, A.; Drullinsky, P.; Gerecitano, J.; Hamlin, P. A.; Ho, C.; Jacob, A.; Joseph, A.; Laraque, L.; Matasar, M. J.; Moskowitz, A. J.; Moskowitz, C. H.; Mullins, C.; Owens, C.; Salles, G.; Schöder, H.; Straus, D. J.; Younes, A.; Zelenetz, A. D.; Kumar, A.
Article Title: Immunochemotherapy plus lenalidomide for high-risk mantle cell lymphoma with measurable residual disease evaluation
Abstract: Chemoimmunotherapy followed by consolidative high-dose therapy with autologous stem cell rescue was a standard upfront treatment for fit patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) in first remission; however, treatment paradigms are evolving in the era of novel therapies. Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory agent with known efficacy in treating MCL. We conducted a single-center, investigator-initiated, phase II study of immunochemotherapy incorporating lenalidomide, without autologous stem cell transplant consolidation, enriching for patients with high-risk MCL (clinicaltrials gov. Identifier: NCT02633137). Patients received four cycles of lenalidomide-R-CHOP, two cycles of R-HiDAC, and six cycles of R-lenalidomide. The primary endpoint was rate of 3-year progression-free survival. We measured measurable residual disease (MRD) using a next-generation sequencing-based assay after each phase of treatment and at 6 months following end-of-treatment. We enrolled 49 patients of which 47 were response evaluable. By intent-to-treat, rates of overall and complete response were equivalent at 88% (43/49), one patient with stable disease, and two patients had disease progression during study; 3-year progression-free survival was 63% (primary endpoint not met) and differed by TP53 status (78% wild-type vs. 38% ALT; P=0.043). MRD status was prognostic and predicted long-term outcomes following R-HiDAC and at 6 months following end-of-treatment. In a high-dose therapy-sparing, intensive approach, we achieved favorable outcomes in TP53wild-type MCL, including high-risk cases. We confirmed that sequential MRD assessment is a powerful prognostic tool in patients with MCL. © 2024 Ferrata Storti Foundation. All rights reserved.
Keywords: adult; cancer chemotherapy; aged; overall survival; gene deletion; lenalidomide; clinical trial; constipation; fatigue; cancer growth; diarrhea; drug efficacy; cytarabine; rituximab; drug megadose; positron emission tomography; follow up; antineoplastic agent; anorexia; cancer immunotherapy; edema; progression free survival; mantle cell lymphoma; multiple cycle treatment; phase 2 clinical trial; anemia; mucosa inflammation; nausea; neuropathy; thrombocytopenia; antineoplastic combined chemotherapy protocols; myalgia; relapse; protein p53; arthralgia; dyspnea; febrile neutropenia; pneumonia; pruritus; rash; immunotherapy; minimal residual disease; sepsis; heterozygosity loss; dry skin; alopecia; cytogenetic analysis; skin infection; lymphoma, mantle-cell; dysgeusia; nose obstruction; hoarseness; single nucleotide polymorphism array; soft tissue infection; high throughput sequencing; intention to treat analysis; human metapneumovirus infection; humans; prognosis; human; male; female; article; cyclophosphamide plus doxorubicin plus prednisolone plus rituximab plus vincristine; measurable residual disease; molecular fingerprinting; peripheral sensory neuropathy; high risk mantle cell lymphoma
Journal Title: Haematologica
Volume: 109
Issue: 4
ISSN: 0390-6078
Publisher: Ferrata Storti Foundation  
Date Published: 2024-04-01
Start Page: 1149
End Page: 1162
Language: English
DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2023.282898
PUBMED: 37646671
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC10985438
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Erratum issued, see DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2024.285845 -- MSK Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA008748) acknowledged in PubMed and PDF -- MSK corresponding author is Anita Kumar -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Craig Moskowitz
    407 Moskowitz
  2. Heiko Schoder
    544 Schoder
  3. Andrew D Zelenetz
    767 Zelenetz
  4. Alison Moskowitz
    339 Moskowitz
  5. Paul Hamlin
    277 Hamlin
  6. Matthew J Matasar
    289 Matasar
  7. Philip C Caron
    90 Caron
  8. David J Straus
    356 Straus
  9. Anita Kumar
    180 Kumar
  10. Connie Wing-Ching Lee Batlevi
    176 Batlevi
  11. Esther Naomi Drill
    93 Drill
  12. Anas Younes
    319 Younes
  13. Ahmet Dogan
    455 Dogan
  14. Colette Ngozi Owens
    66 Owens
  15. Caleb   Ho
    72 Ho
  16. Umut Aypar
    35 Aypar
  17. Gilles Andre Salles
    269 Salles
  18. Ashlee Joseph
    16 Joseph