Nivolumab plus cabozantinib versus sunitinib for first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma: Extended follow-up from the phase III randomised CheckMate 9ER trial Journal Article


Authors: Powles, T.; Burotto, M.; Escudier, B.; Apolo, A. B.; Bourlon, M. T.; Shah, A. Y.; Suárez, C.; Porta, C.; Barrios, C. H.; Richardet, M.; Gurney, H.; Kessler, E. R.; Tomita, Y.; Bedke, J.; George, S.; Scheffold, C.; Wang, P.; Fedorov, V.; Motzer, R. J.; Choueiri, T. K.
Article Title: Nivolumab plus cabozantinib versus sunitinib for first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma: Extended follow-up from the phase III randomised CheckMate 9ER trial
Abstract: Background: Nivolumab plus cabozantinib (NIVO + CABO) was approved for first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) based on superiority versus sunitinib (SUN) in the phase III CheckMate 9ER trial (18.1 months median survival follow-up per database lock date); efficacy benefit was maintained with an extended 32.9 months of median survival follow-up. We report updated efficacy and safety after 44.0 months of median survival follow-up in intent-to-treat (ITT) patients and additional subgroup analyses, including outcomes by International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) prognostic risk score. Patients and methods: Patients with treatment-naïve aRCC received NIVO 240 mg every 2 weeks plus CABO 40 mg once daily or SUN 50 mg for 4 weeks (6-week cycles), until disease progression/unacceptable toxicity (maximum NIVO treatment, 2 years). Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) per blinded independent central review (BICR). Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) per BICR, and safety and tolerability. Results: Overall, 323 patients were randomised to NIVO + CABO and 328 to SUN. Median PFS was improved with NIVO + CABO versus SUN [16.6 versus 8.4 months; hazard ratio (HR) 0.59; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.49-0.71]; median OS favoured NIVO + CABO versus SUN (49.5 versus 35.5 months; HR 0.70; 95% CI 0.56-0.87). ORR (95% CI) was higher with NIVO + CABO versus SUN [56% (50% to 62%) versus 28% (23% to 33%)]; 13% versus 5% of patients achieved complete response, and median duration of response was 22.1 months versus 16.1 months, respectively. PFS and OS favoured NIVO + CABO over SUN across intermediate, poor and intermediate/poor IMDC risk subgroups; higher ORR and complete response rates were seen with NIVO + CABO versus SUN regardless of IMDC risk subgroup. Any-grade (grade ≥3) treatment-related adverse events occurred in 97% (67%) versus 93% (55%) of patients treated with NIVO + CABO versus SUN. Conclusions: After extended follow-up, NIVO + CABO maintained survival and response benefits; safety remained consistent with previous follow-ups. These results continue to support NIVO + CABO as a first-line treatment for aRCC. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03141177. © 2024 The Authors
Keywords: adult; controlled study; major clinical study; overall survival; prednisone; fatigue; sorafenib; sunitinib; advanced cancer; diarrhea; drug safety; hypertension; side effect; follow up; ipilimumab; ticilimumab; progression free survival; multiple cycle treatment; anemia; nausea; randomized controlled trial; stomatitis; thrombocytopenia; inflammation; renal cell carcinoma; temsirolimus; immunotherapy; pazopanib; phase 3 clinical trial; high risk population; hypothyroidism; axitinib; everolimus; disease exacerbation; tegafur; decreased appetite; phase iii; first-line treatment; cabozantinib; tivozanib; nivolumab; time to treatment; oteracil; lenvatinib; human; male; female; article; pembrolizumab; gimeracil; durvalumab; atezolizumab; talazoparib; imdc; savolitinib; belzutifan; favezelimab
Journal Title: ESMO Open
Volume: 9
Issue: 5
ISSN: 2059-7029
Publisher: European Society for Medical Oncology  
Date Published: 2024-05-01
Start Page: 102994
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.102994
PUBMED: 38642472
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC11046044
DOI/URL:
Notes: The MSK Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA008748) is acknowledged in the PDF -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Robert Motzer
    1247 Motzer