2024 focused update: Guidelines on use of corticosteroids in sepsis, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and community-acquired pneumonia Guidelines


Authors: Chaudhuri, D.; Nei, A. M.; Rochwerg, B.; Balk, R. A.; Asehnoune, K.; Cadena, R.; Carcillo, J. A.; Correa, R.; Drover, K.; Esper, A. M.; Gershengorn, H. B.; Hammond, N. E.; Jayaprakash, N.; Menon, K.; Nazer, L.; Pitre, T.; Qasim, Z. A.; Russell, J. A.; Santos, A. P.; Sarwal, A.; Spencer-Segal, J.; Tilouche, N.; Annane, D.; Pastores, S. M.
Title: 2024 focused update: Guidelines on use of corticosteroids in sepsis, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and community-acquired pneumonia
Abstract: RATIONALE: New evidence is available examining the use of corticosteroids in sepsis, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), warranting a focused update of the 2017 guideline on critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency. OBJECTIVES: To develop evidence-based recommendations for use of corticosteroids in hospitalized adults and children with sepsis, ARDS, and CAP. PANEL DESIGN: The 22-member panel included diverse representation from medicine, including adult and pediatric intensivists, pulmonologists, endocrinologists, nurses, pharmacists, and clinician-methodologists with expertise in developing evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines. We followed Society of Critical Care Medicine conflict of interest policies in all phases of the guideline development, including task force selection and voting. METHODS: After development of five focused Population, Intervention, Control, and Outcomes (PICO) questions, we conducted systematic reviews to identify the best available evidence addressing each question. We evaluated the certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach and formulated recommendations using the evidence-to-decision framework. RESULTS: In response to the five PICOs, the panel issued four recommendations addressing the use of corticosteroids in patients with sepsis, ARDS, and CAP. These included a conditional recommendation to administer corticosteroids for patients with septic shock and critically ill patients with ARDS and a strong recommendation for use in hospitalized patients with severe CAP. The panel also recommended against high dose/short duration administration of corticosteroids for septic shock. In response to the final PICO regarding type of corticosteroid molecule in ARDS, the panel was unable to provide specific recommendations addressing corticosteroid molecule, dose, and duration of therapy, based on currently available evidence. CONCLUSIONS: The panel provided updated recommendations based on current evidence to inform clinicians, patients, and other stakeholders on the use of corticosteroids for sepsis, ARDS, and CAP. © 2024 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.
Keywords: adult; child; aged; treatment duration; drug megadose; c reactive protein; low drug dose; evidence based practice; dexamethasone; practice guideline; continuous infusion; intensive care; hospital patient; sepsis; hospital admission; methylprednisolone; development; hydrocortisone; corticosteroid; guidelines; intensive care medicine; critical care; meta analysis; critical illness; adult respiratory distress syndrome; glucocorticoids; respiratory distress syndrome; critically ill patient; bacterial pneumonia; fludrocortisone; corticosteroids; septic shock; nurse; acute respiratory distress syndrome; pharmacist; adrenal cortex hormones; teleconference; community acquired pneumonia; dose-response; clinician; hospitalized child; shock, septic; extubation; endocrinologist; intensivist; community-acquired pneumonia; humans; human; female; article; pulmonologist; sequential organ failure assessment score; mineralocorticoids; grading of recommendations assessment; grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation; enteral drug administration
Journal Title: Critical Care Medicine
Volume: 52
Issue: 5
ISSN: 0090-3493
Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins  
Date Published: 2024-05-01
Start Page: e219
End Page: e233
Language: English
DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000006172
PUBMED: 38240492
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Stephen Pastores
    252 Pastores