Provider perceptions of an electronic health record prostate cancer screening tool Journal Article


Authors: Carlsson, S. V.; Preston, M.; Vickers, A.; Malhotra, D.; Ehdaie, B.; Healey, M.; Kibel, A. S.
Article Title: Provider perceptions of an electronic health record prostate cancer screening tool
Abstract: Objectives We conducted a focus group to assess the attitudes of primary care physicians (PCPs) toward prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-screening algorithms, perceptions of using decision support tools, and features that would make such tools feasible to implement. Methods A multidisciplinary team (primary care, urology, behavioral sciences, bioinformatics) developed the decision support tool that was presented to a focus group of 10 PCPs who also filled out a survey. Notes and audio-recorded transcripts were analyzed using Thematic Content Analysis. Results The survey showed that PCPs followed different guidelines. In total, 7/10 PCPs agreed that engaging in shared decision-making about PSA screening was burdensome. The majority (9/10) had never used a decision aid for PSA screening. Although 70% of PCPs felt confident about their ability to discuss PSA screening, 90% still felt a need for a provider-facing platform to assist in these discussions. Three major themes emerged: (1) confirmatory reactions regarding the importance, innovation, and unmet need for a decision support tool embedded in the electronic health record; (2) issues around implementation and application of the tool in clinic workflow and PCPs' own clinical bias; and (3) attitudes/reflections regarding discrepant recommendations from various guideline groups that cause confusion. Conclusion There was overwhelmingly positive support for the need for a provider-facing decision support tool to assist with PSA-screening decisions in the primary care setting. PCPs appreciated that the tool would allow flexibility for clinical judgment and documentation of shared decision-making. Incorporation of suggestions from this focus group into a second version of the tool will be used in subsequent pilot testing. © 2023 Georg Thieme Verlag. All rights reserved.
Keywords: clinical practice; prostate specific antigen; mass screening; oncology; prostate cancer; prostate-specific antigen; prostatic neoplasms; screening; prostate tumor; general practitioner; early detection of cancer; decision support; physicians, primary care; shared decision-making; electronic health records; humans; human; male; electronic health record; clinical decision support; practice patterns, physicians'; early cancer diagnosis
Journal Title: Applied Clinical Informatics
Volume: 15
Issue: 2
ISSN: 1869-0327
Publisher: Schattauer Gmbh  
Date Published: 2024-03-01
Start Page: 282
End Page: 294
Language: English
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1782619
PUBMED: 38599619
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC11006557
DOI/URL:
Notes: The MSK Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA008748) is acknowledged in the PDF. Corresponding MSK author is Sigrid V. Carlsson -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Andrew J Vickers
    882 Vickers
  2. Behfar Ehdaie
    174 Ehdaie
  3. Sigrid Viktoria Carlsson
    221 Carlsson