Gemcitabine, docetaxel, capecitabine, cisplatin, irinotecan as first-line treatment for metastatic pancreatic cancer Journal Article


Authors: Wilbur, H. C.; Durham, J. N.; Lim, S. J.; Purtell, K.; Bever, K. M.; Laheru, D. A.; De Jesus-Acosta, A.; Azad, N. S.; Wilt, B.; Diaz, L. A.; Le, D. T.; Wang, H.
Article Title: Gemcitabine, docetaxel, capecitabine, cisplatin, irinotecan as first-line treatment for metastatic pancreatic cancer
Abstract: Purpose: Treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer with a single therapeutic at a maximal dose has been largely ineffective at increasing survival. Combination therapies are commonly studied but often limited by toxicity. We previously showed that low-dose multiagent therapy with gemcitabine, docetaxel (taxotere), capecitabine (xeloda), and cisplatin (GTX-C) was safe, well tolerated, and effective (NCT01459614). Here, we hypothesize that adding irinotecan to GTX-C may improve survival with minimal toxicity. Experimental Design: Patients with treatment-naive metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma were treated with gemcitabine, docetaxel (taxotere), capecitabine (xeloda), cisplatin, and irinotecan (GTX-CI). Treatment consisted of capecitabine 500mg twice daily on days 1-14 and gemcitabine 300 to 500 mg/m(2), docetaxel 20mg/m(2), cisplatin 15 to 20mg/m(2), and irinotecan20 to60mg/m(2) on days 4 and 11 of a 21-day cycle. The primary objective was 9-month overall survival (OS). Secondary objectives included response rate (RR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and OS. Results: The regimen was well tolerated. The recommended phase II dose was gemcitabine 500 mg/m(2), docetaxel 20 mg/m(2), capecitabine 500 mg po bid, cisplatin 20 mg/m(2), and irinotecan 20 mg/m(2). Median follow-up in phase II was 11.02 months (2.37-45.17). Nine-month OS rate was 57% [95% confidence interval (CI): (41-77)]. RR was 57% [95% CI: (37-75) 50% PR and 7% CR]. DCR was 87% [95% CI: (69-96)]. Median OS and PFS were 11.02 [95% CI: (8.54-21.09)] and 8.34 [95% CI: (6.34-NA)] months, respectively. Conclusions: The addition of irinotecan to GTX-C was safe and well tolerated. While the study did not meet its primary objective, the responses were clinically meaningful using a well-tolerated regimen.
Journal Title: Cancer Research Communications
Volume: 3
Issue: 8
ISSN: 2767-9764
Publisher: American Association for Cancer Research  
Date Published: 2023-08-01
Start Page: 1672
End Page: 1677
Language: English
ACCESSION: WOS:001161086900020
DOI: 10.1158/2767-9764.Crc-23-0230
PROVIDER: wos
PMCID: PMC10461640
PUBMED: 37645623
Notes: Article -- Source: Wos
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Luis Alberto Diaz
    149 Diaz