Biparametric versus multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for assessing muscle invasion in bladder urothelial carcinoma with variant histology using the Vesical Imaging Reporting and Data System Journal Article


Authors: Arita, Y.; Kwee, T. C.; Woo, S.; Shigeta, K.; Ishii, R.; Okawara, N.; Edo, H.; Waseda, Y.; Vargas, H. A.
Article Title: Biparametric versus multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for assessing muscle invasion in bladder urothelial carcinoma with variant histology using the Vesical Imaging Reporting and Data System
Abstract: Background: The diagnostic performance of contrast medium–free biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI; combining T2-weighted imaging [T2WI] and diffusion-weighted imaging [DWI]) for evaluating variant-histology urothelial carcinoma (VUC) remains unknown. Objective: To compare the diagnostic performance of bpMRI and multiparametric MRI (mpMRI; combining T2WI, DWI, and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI]) for assessing muscle invasion of VUC. Design, setting, and participants: This multi-institution retrospective analysis included 118 patients with pathologically verified VUC who underwent bladder mpMRI before transurethral bladder tumor resection between 2010 and 2019. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Three board-certified radiologists separately evaluated two sets of images, set 1 (bpMRI) and set 2 (mpMRI), in accordance with the Vesical Imaging Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS). The histopathology results were utilized as a reference standard. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, Z test, and Wald test were used to assess diagnostic abilities. Results and limitations: Sixty-six (55.9%) and 52 (44.1%) of the 118 patients with VUC included in the analysis (mean age, 71 ± 10 yr; 88 men) had muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) and non-MIBC, respectively. For the diagnosis of MIBC, the areas under the curve for bpMRI were significantly smaller than those for mpMRI (0.870–0.884 vs 0.902–0.923, p < 0.05). The sensitivity of bpMRI was significantly lower than that of mpMRI for all readers with a VI-RADS cutoff score of 4 (65.2–66.7% vs 77.3–80.3%, p < 0.05). The specificity of bpMRI and mpMRI did not differ significantly for all readers (88.5–90.4 vs 88.5–92.3, p > 0.05). A limitation of the study is the limited sample size because of the rarity of VUC. Conclusions: In patients with VUC, on applying VI-RADS, the diagnostic results of bpMRI were inferior to those of mpMRI for evaluating muscle invasion. Therefore, mpMRI-based methods are recommended for evaluating muscle invasiveness of VUC. Patient summary: Contrast medium–free biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI)-based Vesical Imaging Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) can accurately diagnose pure urothelial carcinomas, similar to conventional multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging–based VI-RADS. However, bpMRI-based VI-RADS may misdiagnose muscle invasiveness of urothelial carcinoma with variant histology, particularly when its cutoff score is 4. © 2023 European Association of Urology
Keywords: adult; controlled study; human tissue; aged; aged, 80 and over; middle aged; cancer surgery; retrospective studies; major clinical study; histopathology; nuclear magnetic resonance imaging; magnetic resonance imaging; neoplasm staging; sensitivity and specificity; diffusion; pathology; diagnostic imaging; retrospective study; bladder tumor; urinary bladder neoplasms; diagnostic value; radical cystectomy; urinary bladder; intermethod comparison; contrast medium; contrast media; sex difference; age distribution; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; cancer classification; carcinoma, transitional cell; transitional cell carcinoma; diffusion weighted imaging; chemoradiotherapy; muscle; muscles; bladder; interrater reliability; diagnostic test accuracy study; tumor invasion; procedures; very elderly; multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging; humans; human; male; female; article; gadobutrol; vesical imaging reporting and data system; transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder; biparametric magnetic resonance imaging
Journal Title: European Urology Focus
Volume: 10
Issue: 1
ISSN: 2405-4569
Publisher: Elsevier B.V.  
Date Published: 2023-12-31
Start Page: 131
End Page: 138
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.08.004
PUBMED: 37633790
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- MSK corresponding author is Yuki Arita -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Yuki Arita
    16 Arita