Overall survival from tebentafusp versus nivolumab plus ipilimumab in first-line metastatic uveal melanoma: A propensity score-weighted analysis Journal Article


Authors: Piulats, J. M.; Watkins, C.; Costa-García, M.; del Carpio, L.; Piperno-Neumann, S.; Rutkowski, P.; Hassel, J. C.; Espinosa, E.; de la Cruz-Merino, L.; Ochsenreither, S.; Shoushtari, A. N.; Orloff, M.; Salama, A. K. S.; Goodall, H. M.; Baurain, J. F.; Nathan, P.
Article Title: Overall survival from tebentafusp versus nivolumab plus ipilimumab in first-line metastatic uveal melanoma: A propensity score-weighted analysis
Abstract: Background: Tebentafusp demonstrated a superior overall survival (OS) benefit [hazard ratio (HR) 0.51] compared to investigator's choice (82% pembrolizumab) in a randomized, phase III trial (IMCgp100-202; N = 378) in untreated metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM). The 1-year OS rates for tebentafusp and pembrolizumab were 73% and 59%, respectively. In the single-arm GEM1402 (N = 52), the 1-year OS rate for nivolumab plus ipilimumab (N+I) in mUM was 52%. Due to limitations in conducting randomized trials in mUM, we compared OS on tebentafusp or pembrolizumab (IMCgp100-202) to N+I (GEM1402) in untreated mUM using propensity scoring methods. Patients and methods: Analyses were adjusted using propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), balancing age, sex, baseline lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), baseline alkaline phosphatase, disease location, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status, and time from primary diagnosis to metastasis. OS was assessed using IPT-weighted Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazard models. Sensitivity analyses using alternative missing data and weights methods were conducted. Results: The primary IPTW analysis included 240 of 252 patients randomized to tebentafusp from IMCgp100-202 and 45 of 52 N+I-treated patients from GEM-1402. Key baseline covariates, including LDH, were generally well balanced before weighting. The IPTW-adjusted OS favored tebentafusp, HR 0.52 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.35-0.78]; 1-year OS was 73% for tebentafusp versus 50% for N+I. Sensitivity analyses showed consistent superior OS for tebentafusp with all IPTW HRs ≤0.61. IPTW analysis of pembrolizumab versus N+I showed no significant difference in OS (HR 0.72; 95% CI 0.50-1.06). Conclusions: Tebentafusp was previously shown to provide an OS benefit compared to checkpoint inhibitors or chemotherapy in untreated mUM. Propensity score analysis demonstrated a similar OS benefit for tebentafusp compared with N+I. These data further support tebentafusp as the standard of care in previously untreated human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A∗02:01+ adult patients with mUM. © 2023 The Author(s)
Keywords: adult; controlled study; human tissue; aged; human cell; major clinical study; overall survival; cancer localization; drug efficacy; chemotherapy; antineoplastic agent; sensitivity analysis; ipilimumab; melanoma; phase 2 clinical trial; randomized controlled trial; antineoplastic combined chemotherapy protocols; cohort analysis; age; confidence interval; alkaline phosphatase; liver metastasis; proportional hazards model; recombinant fusion proteins; probability; lactate dehydrogenase; sex difference; alkaline phosphatase blood level; phase 3 clinical trial; uvea melanoma; uvea tumor; uveal neoplasms; lactate dehydrogenase blood level; fusion protein; uveal melanoma; propensity score; first-line treatment; nivolumab; humans; human; male; female; article; pembrolizumab; metastatic uveal melanoma; ecog performance status; tebentafusp; propensity score-weighted analysis
Journal Title: Annals of Oncology
Volume: 35
Issue: 3
ISSN: 0923-7534
Publisher: Oxford University Press  
Date Published: 2024-03-01
Start Page: 317
End Page: 326
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.11.013
PUBMED: 38048850
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: The MSK Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA008748) is acknowledged in the PDF -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors