A risk analysis of alpelisib-induced hyperglycemia in patients with advanced solid tumors and breast cancer Journal Article


Authors: Rodón, J.; Demanse, D.; Rugo, H. S.; Burris, H. A.; Simó, R.; Farooki, A.; Wellons, M. F.; André, F.; Hu, H.; Vuina, D.; Quadt, C.; Juric, D.
Article Title: A risk analysis of alpelisib-induced hyperglycemia in patients with advanced solid tumors and breast cancer
Abstract: Background: Hyperglycemia is an on-target effect of PI3Kα inhibitors. Early identification and intervention of treatment-induced hyperglycemia is important for improving management of patients receiving a PI3Kα inhibitor like alpelisib. Here, we characterize incidence of grade 3/4 alpelisib-related hyperglycemia, along with time to event, management, and outcomes using a machine learning model. Methods: Data for the risk model were pooled from patients receiving alpelisib ± fulvestrant in the open-label, phase 1 X2101 trial and the randomized, double-blind, phase 3 SOLAR-1 trial. The pooled population (n = 505) included patients with advanced solid tumors (X2101, n = 221) or HR+/HER2− advanced breast cancer (SOLAR-1, n = 284). External validation was performed using BYLieve trial patient data (n = 340). Hyperglycemia incidence and management were analyzed for SOLAR-1. Results: A random forest model identified 5 baseline characteristics most associated with risk of developing grade 3/4 hyperglycemia (fasting plasma glucose, body mass index, HbA1c, monocytes, age). This model was used to derive a score to classify patients as high or low risk for developing grade 3/4 hyperglycemia. Applying the model to patients treated with alpelisib and fulvestrant in SOLAR-1 showed higher incidence of hyperglycemia (all grade and grade 3/4), increased use of antihyperglycemic medications, and more discontinuations due to hyperglycemia (16.7% vs. 2.6% of discontinuations) in the high- versus low-risk group. Among patients in SOLAR-1 (alpelisib + fulvestrant arm) with PIK3CA mutations, median progression-free survival was similar between the high- and low-risk groups (11.0 vs. 10.9 months). For external validation, the model was applied to the BYLieve trial, for which successful classification into high- and low-risk groups with shorter time to grade 3/4 hyperglycemia in the high-risk group was observed. Conclusions: A risk model using 5 clinically relevant baseline characteristics was able to identify patients at higher or lower probability for developing alpelisib-induced hyperglycemia. Early identification of patients who may be at higher risk for hyperglycemia may improve management (including monitoring and early intervention) and potentially lead to improved outcomes. Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01219699 (registration date: October 13, 2010; retrospectively registered), ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02437318 (registration date: May 7, 2015); ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03056755 (registration date: February 17, 2017). © The Author(s) 2024.
Keywords: cancer survival; controlled study; survival analysis; major clinical study; placebo; advanced cancer; dose response; drug dose reduction; drug efficacy; drug safety; drug withdrawal; solid tumor; outcome assessment; gene; progression free survival; breast cancer; randomized controlled trial; hemoglobin blood level; breast neoplasms; risk factor; age; risk assessment; hyperglycemia; survival time; body mass; adverse outcome; multicenter study; breast tumor; glucose blood level; open study; glucose; phase 3 clinical trial; phase 1 clinical trial; high risk population; double blind procedure; thiazoles; pik3ca gene; fulvestrant; thiazole derivative; hemoglobin a1c; machine learning; cancer prognosis; low risk population; humans; human; female; article; alpelisib; random forest; monocyte count; bylieve; hr+/her2− advanced breast cancer; solar-1
Journal Title: Breast Cancer Research
Volume: 26
ISSN: 1465-5411
Publisher: Biomed Central Ltd  
Date Published: 2024-03-04
Start Page: 36
Language: English
DOI: 10.1186/s13058-024-01773-1
PUBMED: 38439079
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC10913434
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Azeez Farooki
    77 Farooki