Pathogenic germline variants in patients with endometrial cancer of diverse ancestry Journal Article


Authors: Liu, Y. L.; Gordhandas, S.; Arora, K.; Rios-Doria, E.; Cadoo, K. A.; Catchings, A.; Maio, A.; Kemel, Y.; Sheehan, M.; Salo-Mullen, E.; Zhou, Q.; Iasonos, A.; Carrot-Zhang, J.; Manning-Geist, B.; Sia, T. Y.; Selenica, P.; Vanderbilt, C.; Misyura, M.; Latham, A.; Bandlamudi, C.; Berger, M. F.; Hamilton, J. G.; Makker, V.; Abu-Rustum, N. R.; Ellenson, L. H.; Offit, K.; Mandelker, D. L.; Stadler, Z.; Weigelt, B.; Aghajanian, C.; Brown, C.
Article Title: Pathogenic germline variants in patients with endometrial cancer of diverse ancestry
Abstract: Background: Racial disparities in outcomes exist in endometrial cancer (EC). The contribution of ancestry-based variations in germline pathogenic variants (gPVs) is unknown. Methods: Germline assessment of ≥76 cancer predisposition genes was performed in patients with EC undergoing tumor-normal Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets sequencing from January 1, 2015 through June 30, 2021. Self-reported race/ethnicity and Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry data classified patients into groups. Genetic ancestry was inferred from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets. Rates of gPV and genetic counseling were compared by ancestry. Results: Among 1625 patients with EC, 216 (13%) had gPVs; 15 had >1 gPV. Rates of gPV varied by self-reported ancestry (Ashkenazi Jewish, 40/202 [20%]; Asian, 15/124 [12%]; Black/African American (AA), 12/171 [7.0%]; Hispanic, 15/124 [12%]; non-Hispanic (NH) White, 129/927 [14%]; missing, 5/77 [6.5%]; p =.009], with similar findings by genetic ancestry (p <.001). We observed a lower likelihood of gPVs in patients of Black/AA (odds ratio [OR], 0.44; 95% CI, 0.22–0.81) and African (AFR) ancestry (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.18–0.85) and a higher likelihood in patients of Ashkenazi Jewish genetic ancestry (OR, 1.62; 95% CI; 1.11–2.34) compared with patients of non-Hispanic White/European ancestry, even after adjustment for age and molecular subtype. Somatic landscape influenced gPVs with lower rates of microsatellite instability-high tumors in patients of Black/AA and AFR ancestry. Among those with newly identified gPVs (n = 114), 102 (89%) were seen for genetic counseling, with lowest rates among Black/AA (75%) and AFR patients (67%). Conclusions: In those with EC, gPV and genetic counseling varied by ancestry, with lowest rates among Black/AA and AFR patients, potentially contributing to disparities in outcomes given implications for treatment and cancer prevention. Plain Language Summary: Black women with endometrial cancer do worse than White women, and there are many reasons for this disparity. Certain genetic changes from birth (mutations) can increase the risk of cancer, and it is unknown if rates of these changes are different between different ancestry groups. Genetic mutations in 1625 diverse women with endometrial cancer were studied and the lowest rates of mutations and genetic counseling were found in Black and African ancestry women. This could affect their treatment options as well as their families and may make disparities worse. © 2023 American Cancer Society.
Keywords: adult; major clinical study; genetics; cancer staging; outcome assessment; endometrial cancer; endometrial neoplasms; endometrium cancer; genetic analysis; phenotype; cancer susceptibility; germ cell; cohort analysis; self report; germ cells; microsatellite instability; trend study; endometrium tumor; ethnicity; african american; genetic testing; caucasian; genetic counseling; race; hispanic; white; disparities; ancestry group; humans; human; female; article; black person; ancestry; hispanic or latino; germline finding
Journal Title: Cancer
Volume: 130
Issue: 4
ISSN: 0008-543X
Publisher: Wiley Blackwell  
Date Published: 2024-02-15
Start Page: 576
End Page: 587
Language: English
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35071
PUBMED: 37886874
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC10922155
DOI/URL:
Notes: The MSK Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA008748) is acknowledged in the PDF -- Corresponding author is MSK authors: Ying L. Liu -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Vicky Makker
    263 Makker
  2. Kenneth Offit
    788 Offit
  3. Carol Brown
    167 Brown
  4. Zsofia Kinga Stadler
    387 Stadler
  5. Qin Zhou
    253 Zhou
  6. Alexia Elia Iasonos
    362 Iasonos
  7. Michael Forman Berger
    764 Berger
  8. Yelena Kemel
    103 Kemel
  9. Britta Weigelt
    632 Weigelt
  10. Jada Gabrielle Hamilton
    111 Hamilton
  11. Margaret Rebecca Graham Sheehan
    45 Sheehan
  12. Diana Lauren Mandelker
    178 Mandelker
  13. Pier Selenica
    189 Selenica
  14. Ying Liu
    105 Liu
  15. Alicia Latham
    58 Latham
  16. Lora Hedrick Ellenson
    108 Ellenson
  17. Anna Maio
    35 Maio
  18. Maksym Misyura
    13 Misyura
  19. Kanika Suresh Arora
    27 Arora
  20. Tiffany Yilan Sia
    30 Sia