Current practices, perceived barriers, and promising implementation strategies for improving quality of smoking cessation support in accredited cancer programs of the American College of Surgeons Journal Article


Authors: Ostroff, J. S.; Reilly, E. M.; Burris, J. L.; Warren, G. W.; Shelton, R. C.; Mullett, T. W.; the Just ASK Quality Improvement Task Force
Article Title: Current practices, perceived barriers, and promising implementation strategies for improving quality of smoking cessation support in accredited cancer programs of the American College of Surgeons
Abstract: PURPOSE: Persistent smoking is associated with poor outcomes in cancer care. It is strongly recommended that oncology care providers provide cessation support; however, there is limited information about smoking cessation assessment and treatment patterns in routine oncology practice. METHODS: Leaders of the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer (CoC) and National Accreditation Program for Breast Centers (National Accredited Program for Breast Cancer) elected to participate in a national quality improvement initiative (Just ASK) focused on smoking assessment/treatment in cancer care. Online baseline survey responses were received from 762 accredited programs. RESULTS: Most programs reported regularly asking about smoking (89.9%), documenting smoking history and current use (85.8%), and advising patients to quit (71.2%). However, less than half of programs reported documenting a smoking cessation treatment plan (41.7%). Even fewer programs reported regularly assisting patients with quitting (41.3%), providing self-help information (27.2%), providing individual counseling (18.2%), and referring patients to an affiliated tobacco treatment program (26.1%) or external Quitline (28.5%). Very few programs reported regularly prescribing medications (17.6%). Principal barriers to tobacco treatment delivery were lack of staff training (68.8%), lack of designated specialists (61.9%), perceived patient resistance (58.3%), lack of available resources (53.3%), competing clinical priorities (50.9%), inadequate program funding (40.6%), insufficient staff time (42.4%), and inadequate reimbursement (31.0%). CONCLUSION: Although programs reported a high rate of smoking assessment, critical gaps in advising and assisting patients with cessation were found. Improving equitable delivery of smoking assessment/treatment in cancer care will require addressing key organizational and provider barriers for implementation of best practices.
Keywords: united states; neoplasm; neoplasms; psychology; smoking cessation; smoking; surgeon; health care delivery; delivery of health care; surgeons; humans; human
Journal Title: JCO Oncology Practice
Volume: 20
Issue: 2
ISSN: 2688-1527
Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology  
Date Published: 2024-02-01
Start Page: 212
End Page: 219
Language: English
DOI: 10.1200/op.23.00393
PUBMED: 37967292
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC10911542
DOI/URL:
Notes: The MSK Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA008748) is acknowledged in the PDF. Corresponding MSK author is Jamie S. Ostroff -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Jamie S Ostroff
    344 Ostroff