Ciltacabtagene autoleucel in patients with prior allogeneic stem cell transplant in the CARTITUDE-1 study Journal Article


Authors: Htut, M.; Dhakal, B.; Cohen, A. D.; Martin, T.; Berdeja, J. G.; Usmani, S. Z.; Agha, M.; Jackson, C. C.; Madduri, D.; Deraedt, W.; Zudaire, E.; Yeh, T. M.; Xu, X.; Pacaud, L.; Akram, M.; Jagannath, S.
Article Title: Ciltacabtagene autoleucel in patients with prior allogeneic stem cell transplant in the CARTITUDE-1 study
Abstract: Treatment options for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) after relapse from allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT) are needed. This study provides data around suitability of CAR-T therapy, specifically ciltacabtagene autoleucel, for heavily pretreated patients with RRMM and prior alloSCT. Patients in the CARTITUDE-1 study with prior alloSCT (n = 7) had similar efficacy and safety profiles to those without prior alloSCT.Background: Patients with prior allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT) are typically excluded from trials of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies, because their engineered cells may include allogeneic T cells. Ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) demonstrated early, deep, durable responses and manageable safety in heavily pretreated relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients. We retrospectively analyzed patients who received alloSCT prior to cilta-cel in CARTITUDE-1. Patients and methods: Patients eligible for CARTITUDE-1 were >= 18 years, had >= 3 prior lines of therapy (LOT) or were double refractory to a proteasome inhibitor (PI) and immunomodulatory drug (IMiD) and had received a PI, IMiD, and anti-CD38 antibody. Patients with active graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) or had alloSCT within 6 months before apheresis were excluded. Patients received cilta-cel 5 to 7 days after lymphodepletion. Results: Patients (N = 7) received median 9 prior LOTs (range, 6-14); median time since alloSCT was 5.1 years (range, 2.7-6.2). At median follow-up 27.7 months after cilta-cel infusion, overall response rate was 85.7% (n = 6). The safety profile was generally consistent with patients without alloSCT as prior therapy (cytokine release syndrome, 85.7% vs. 95.6%, respectively; immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome, 14.3% vs. 16.7%). One patient with prior alloSCT had grade 3 movement and neurocognitive treatment-emergent adverse events/parkinsonism. No GVHD cases were reported. Two patients died due to adverse events (treatment-related lung abscess; unrelated liver failure). Conclusion: Cilta-cel efficacy and safety were comparable between CARTITUDE-1 patients with and without prior alloSCT. Additional studies are needed to fully elucidate the suitability of CAR-T cell therapy in the post-alloSCT setting.
Keywords: survival; multiple myeloma; safety; efficacy; disease; multiple-myeloma; graft-versus-host disease; cilta-cel; car-t therapy
Journal Title: Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma and Leukemia
Volume: 23
Issue: 12
ISSN: 2152-2650
Publisher: Elsevier Inc.  
Date Published: 2023-12-01
Start Page: 882
End Page: 888
Language: English
ACCESSION: WOS:001125512100001
DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2023.08.012
PROVIDER: wos
PUBMED: 37716872
Notes: Article -- Source: Wos
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Saad Zafar Usmani
    296 Usmani