Which hematology/oncology patients are high priority for ambulatory clinical pharmacist review? A three-round Delphi survey by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Journal Article


Authors: Booth, J. P.; Kennerly-Shah, J. M.; Kelley, L. R.; Capozzi, D.; Prescott, H. A.; Soefje, S. A.; Pace, M. B.; Barbour, S. Y.; Tizon, R. F.; DeVincenzo, S.; Carnes, C. A.; Neidecker, M. V.
Article Title: Which hematology/oncology patients are high priority for ambulatory clinical pharmacist review? A three-round Delphi survey by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network
Abstract: Introduction: Prioritization and acuity tools have been leveraged to facilitate targeted and efficient clinical pharmacist interventions. However, there is a lack of established pharmacy-specific acuity factors in the ambulatory hematology/oncology setting. Therefore, National Comprehensive Cancer Network's Pharmacy Directors Forum conducted a survey to establish consensus on acuity factors associated with hematology/oncology patients that are high priority for ambulatory clinical pharmacist review. Methods: A three-round electronic Delphi survey was conducted. During the first round, respondents were asked an open-ended question to suggest acuity factors based on their expert opinion. Respondents were then asked in the second round to agree or disagree with the compiled acuity factors, in which those with ≥75% agreement were included in the third round. The final consensus was defined as a mean score ≥3.33 on a modified 4-point Likert scale (4 = strongly agree, 1 = strongly disagree) during the third round. Results: A total of 124 hematology/oncology clinical pharmacists completed the first round of the Delphi survey (invitation response rate, 36.7%), of which 103 completed the second round (response rate, 83.1%) and 84 the third round (response rate, 67.7%). A final consensus was achieved for 18 acuity factors. Acuity factors were identified in the following themes: antineoplastic regimen characteristics, drug interactions, organ dysfunction, pharmacogenomics, recent discharge, laboratory parameters, and treatment-related toxicities. Conclusions: This Delphi panel of 124 clinical pharmacists achieved consensus on 18 acuity factors that would identify a hematology/oncology patient as a high priority for ambulatory clinical pharmacist review. The research team envisions incorporating these acuity factors into a pharmacy-specific electronic scoring tool. © The Author(s) 2023.
Keywords: adult; major clinical study; cancer patient; antineoplastic agent; neoplasm; neoplasms; consensus; melanoma; breast cancer; oncology; sarcoma; hematologic malignancy; head and neck cancer; lymphoma; cell therapy; delphi study; hospital discharge; granulocyte colony stimulating factor; drug interactions; residency education; myeloma; multiple organ failure; drug interaction; pharmacist; pharmacogenomics; pharmacists; neuroendocrine disease; prioritization; patient acuity; humans; human; article; ambulatory; malignant neoplasm; clinical pharmacy; pharmacy (shop); pharmaceutical services; clinical pharmacist; laboratory based surveillance; pharmacist attitude
Journal Title: Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice
Volume: 29
Issue: 8
ISSN: 1078-1552
Publisher: Sage Publications Ltd.  
Date Published: 2023-12-01
Start Page: 1907
End Page: 1914
Language: English
DOI: 10.1177/10781552231157660
PUBMED: 36803319
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Richard Ferrariz Tizon
    6 Tizon