International standardization and optimization group for intersphincteric resection (ISOG-ISR): Modified Delphi consensus on anatomy, definition, indication, surgical technique, specimen description and functional outcome Guidelines


Authors: Piozzi, G. N.; Khobragade, K.; Aliyev, V.; Asoglu, O.; Bianchi, P. P.; Butiurca, V. O.; Chen, W. T. L.; Cheong, J. Y.; Choi, G. S.; Coratti, A.; Denost, Q.; Fukunaga, Y.; Gorgun, E.; Guerra, F.; Ito, M.; Khan, J. S.; Kim, H. J.; Kim, J. C.; Kinugasa, Y.; Konishi, T.; Kuo, L. J.; Kuzu, M. A.; Lefevre, J. H.; Liang, J. T.; Marks, J.; Molnar, C.; Panis, Y.; Rouanet, P.; Rullier, E.; Saklani, A.; Spinelli, A.; Tsarkov, P.; Tsukamoto, S.; Weiser, M.; Kim, S. H.
Title: International standardization and optimization group for intersphincteric resection (ISOG-ISR): Modified Delphi consensus on anatomy, definition, indication, surgical technique, specimen description and functional outcome
Abstract: Aim: Intersphincteric resection (ISR) is an oncologically complex operation for very low-lying rectal cancers. Yet, definition, anatomical description, operative indications and operative approaches to ISR are not standardized. The aim of this study was to standardize the definition of ISR by reaching international consensus from the experts in the field. This standardization will allow meaningful comparison in the literature in the future. Method: A modified Delphi approach with three rounds of questionnaire was adopted. A total of 29 international experts from 11 countries were recruited for this study. Six domains with a total of 37 statements were examined, including anatomical definition; definition of intersphincteric dissection, intersphincteric resection (ISR) and ultra-low anterior resection (uLAR); indication for ISR; surgical technique of ISR; specimen description of ISR; and functional outcome assessment protocol. Results: Three rounds of questionnaire were performed (response rate 100%, 89.6%, 89.6%). Agreement (≥80%) reached standardization on 36 statements. Conclusion: This study provides an international expert consensus-based definition and standardization of ISR. This is the first study standardizing terminology and definition of deep pelvis/anal canal anatomy from a surgical point of view. Intersphincteric dissection, ISR and uLAR were specifically defined for precise surgical description. Indication for ISR was determined by the rectal tumour's maximal radial infiltration (T stage) below the levator ani. A new surgical definition of T3isp was reached by consensus to define T3 low rectal tumours infiltrating the intersphincteric plane. A practical flowchart for surgical indication for uLAR/ISR/abdominoperineal resection was developed. A standardized ISR surgical technique and functional outcome assessment protocol was defined. © 2023 Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.
Keywords: treatment outcome; surgical technique; cancer staging; outcome assessment; treatment indication; tumor localization; consensus; pathology; surgical approach; pathological anatomy; questionnaire; standardization; consensus development; delphi study; delphi technique; rectal neoplasms; rectum cancer; rectum tumor; surgical anatomy; rectum surgery; medical expert; rectal cancer; rectum; anal canal; rectum abdominoperineal resection; abdominoperineal resection; pelvic floor; intersphincteric resection; humans; human; article; medical terminology; ultra-low anterior resection
Journal Title: Colorectal Disease
Volume: 25
Issue: 9
ISSN: 1462-8910
Publisher: Wiley Blackwell  
Date Published: 2023-09-01
Start Page: 1896
End Page: 1909
Language: English
DOI: 10.1111/codi.16704
PUBMED: 37563772
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Martin R Weiser
    534 Weiser