Blood-based tests for multicancer early detection (PATHFINDER): A prospective cohort study Journal Article


Authors: Schrag, D.; Beer, T. M.; McDonnell, C. H. 3rd; Nadauld, L.; Dilaveri, C. A.; Reid, R.; Marinac, C. R.; Chung, K. C.; Lopatin, M.; Fung, E. T.; Klein, E. A.
Article Title: Blood-based tests for multicancer early detection (PATHFINDER): A prospective cohort study
Abstract: Background: Multicancer early detection (MCED) blood tests can detect a cancer signal from circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA). PATHFINDER was a prospective cohort study investigating the feasibility of MCED testing for cancer screening. Methods: In this prospective cohort study done in oncology and primary care outpatient clinics at seven US health networks, a convenience sample of adults aged 50 years or older without signs or symptoms of cancer consented to MCED testing. We collected blood, analysed cfDNA, and returned results to participants’ doctors. If a methylation signature indicative of cancer was detected, predicted cancer signal origin(s) informed diagnostic assessment. The primary outcome was time to, and extent of, diagnostic testing required to confirm the presence or absence of cancer. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04241796, and is completed. Findings: Between Dec 12, 2019, and Dec 4, 2020, we recruited 6662 participants. 4204 (63·5%) of 6621 participants with analysable results were women, 2417 (36·5%) were men, and 6071 (91·7%) were White. A cancer signal was detected in 92 (1·4%) of 6621 participants with analysable results. 35 (38%) participants were diagnosed with cancer (true positives) and 57 (62%) had no cancer diagnosis (false positives). Excluding two participants whose diagnostic assessments began before MCED test results were reported, median time to diagnostic resolution was 79 days (IQR 37–219): 57 days (33–143) in true-positive and 162 days (44–248) in false-positive participants. Most participants had both laboratory tests (26 [79%] of 33 with true-positive results and 50 [88%] of 57 with false-positive results) and imaging (30 [91%] of 33 with true-positive results and 53 [93%] of 57 with false-positive results). Fewer procedures were done in participants with false-positive results (17 [30%] of 57) than true-positive results (27 [82%] of 33) and few had surgery (one with a false-positive result and three with a true-positive result). Interpretation: This study supports the feasibility of MCED screening for cancer and underscores the need for further research investigating the test's clinical utility. Funding: GRAIL. © 2023 Elsevier Ltd
Keywords: adult; controlled study; aged; middle aged; cancer surgery; unclassified drug; united states; prospective study; prospective studies; neoplasm; neoplasms; cancer susceptibility; cohort analysis; cancer screening; smoking; diagnostic imaging; oncology; dna methylation; age; feasibility study; dna; laboratory test; blood analysis; physician; outpatient; diagnostic test; false positive result; primary medical care; multiple cancer; early detection of cancer; predictive value; caucasian; blood examination; medical history; hematologic tests; clinical outcome; humans; human; male; female; article; early cancer diagnosis; cell free dna; cell-free nucleic acids; cell free nucleic acid
Journal Title: Lancet
Volume: 402
Issue: 10409
ISSN: 0140-6736
Publisher: Elsevier Science, Inc.  
Date Published: 2023-10-07
Start Page: 1251
End Page: 1260
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(23)01700-2
PUBMED: 37805216
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC11027492
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- MSK corresponding author is Deb Schrag -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Deborah Schrag
    235 Schrag