Relacorilant + nab-paclitaxel in patients with recurrent, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: A three-arm, randomized, controlled, open-label phase II study Journal Article


Authors: Colombo, N.; Van Gorp, T.; Matulonis, U. A.; Oaknin, A.; Grisham, R. N.; Fleming, G. F.; Olawaiye, A. B.; Nguyen, D. D.; Greenstein, A. E.; Custodio, J. M.; Pashova, H. I.; Tudor, I. C.; Lorusso, D.
Article Title: Relacorilant + nab-paclitaxel in patients with recurrent, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: A three-arm, randomized, controlled, open-label phase II study
Abstract: PURPOSE: Despite therapeutic advances, outcomes for patients with platinum-resistant/refractory ovarian cancer remain poor. Selective glucocorticoid receptor modulation with relacorilant may restore chemosensitivity and enhance chemotherapy efficacy. METHODS: This three-arm, randomized, controlled, open-label phase II study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03776812) enrolled women with recurrent, platinum-resistant/refractory, high-grade serous or endometrioid epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer, or ovarian carcinosarcoma treated with ≤4 prior chemotherapeutic regimens. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to (1) nab-paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) + intermittent relacorilant (150 mg the day before, of, and after nab-paclitaxel); (2) nab-paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) + continuous relacorilant (100 mg once daily); or (3) nab-paclitaxel monotherapy (100 mg/m2). Nab-paclitaxel was administered on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) by investigator assessment; objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), overall survival (OS), and safety were secondary end points. RESULTS: A total of 178 women were randomly assigned. Intermittent relacorilant + nab-paclitaxel improved PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.66; log-rank test P = .038; median follow-up, 11.1 months) and DOR (HR, 0.36; P = .006) versus nab-paclitaxel monotherapy, while ORR was similar across arms. At the preplanned OS analysis (median follow-up, 22.5 months), the OS HR was 0.67 (P = .066) for the intermittent arm versus nab-paclitaxel monotherapy. Continuous relacorilant + nab-paclitaxel showed numerically improved median PFS but did not result in significant improvement over nab-paclitaxel monotherapy. Adverse events were comparable across study arms, with neutropenia, anemia, peripheral neuropathy, and fatigue/asthenia being the most common grade ≥3 adverse events. CONCLUSION: Intermittent relacorilant + nab-paclitaxel improved PFS, DOR, and OS compared with nab-paclitaxel monotherapy. On the basis of protocol-prespecified Hochberg step-up multiplicity adjustment, the primary end point did not reach statistical significance (P < .025). A phase III evaluation of this regimen is underway (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05257408).
Journal Title: Journal of Clinical Oncology
Volume: 41
Issue: 30
ISSN: 0732-183X
Publisher: American Society of Clinical Oncology  
Date Published: 2023-10-20
Start Page: 4779
End Page: 4789
Language: English
DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.02624
PUBMED: 37364223
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC10602497
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Rachel Nicole Grisham
    169 Grisham