Anti-glycolytic drugs in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: Systemic and locoregional options Review


Authors: Pourbaghi, M.; Haghani, L.; Zhao, K.; Karimi, A.; Marinelli, B.; Erinjeri, J. P.; Geschwind, J. F. H.; Yarmohammadi, H.
Review Title: Anti-glycolytic drugs in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: Systemic and locoregional options
Abstract: Hepatocellular cancer (HCC) is the most common primary liver cancer and the third leading cause of cancer-related death. Locoregional therapies, including transarterial embolization (TAE: bland embolization), chemoembolization (TACE), and radioembolization, have demonstrated survival benefits when treating patients with unresectable HCC. TAE and TACE occlude the tumor's arterial supply, causing hypoxia and nutritional deprivation and ultimately resulting in tumor necrosis. Embolization blocks the aerobic metabolic pathway. However, tumors, including HCC, use the "Warburg effect" and survive hypoxia from embolization. An adaptation to hypoxia through the Warburg effect, which was first described in 1956, is when the cancer cells switch to glycolysis even in the presence of oxygen. Hence, this is also known as aerobic glycolysis. In this article, the adaptation mechanisms of HCC, including glycolysis, are discussed, and anti-glycolytic treatments, including systemic and locoregional options that have been previously reported or have the potential to be utilized in the treatment of HCC, are reviewed.
Journal Title: Current Oncology
Volume: 30
Issue: 7
ISSN: 1198-0052
Publisher: Multimed Inc  
Date Published: 2023-07-01
Start Page: 6609
End Page: 6622
Language: English
DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30070485
PROVIDER: EBSCOhost
PROVIDER: cinahl
PMCID: PMC10377758
PUBMED: 37504345
DOI/URL:
Notes: Accession Number: 168598424 -- Entry Date: In Process -- Revision Date: 20230801 -- Publication Type: Article -- Journal Subset: Biomedical; Canada; Editorial Board Reviewed; Expert Peer Reviewed; Peer Reviewed -- NLM UID: 9502503. -- Source: Cinahl
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics