Is surgical excision of focal atypical ductal hyperplasia warranted? Experience at a tertiary care center Journal Article


Authors: Grabenstetter, A.; Brennan, S. B.; Sevilimedu, V.; Kuba, M. G.; Giri, D. D.; Wen, H. Y.; Morrow, M.; Brogi, E.
Article Title: Is surgical excision of focal atypical ductal hyperplasia warranted? Experience at a tertiary care center
Abstract: Background: The core-needle biopsy (CNB) diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) generally mandates follow-up excision, but controversy exists on whether small foci of ADH require surgical management. This study evaluated the upgrade rate at excision of focal ADH (fADH), defined as 1 focus spanning ≤ 2 mm. Methods: We retrospectively identified in-house CNBs with ADH as the highest-risk lesion obtained between January 2013 and December 2017. A radiologist assessed radiologic–pathologic concordance. All CNB slides were reviewed by two breast pathologists, and ADH was classified as fADH and nonfocal ADH based on extent. Only cases with follow-up excision were included. The slides of excision specimens with upgrade were reviewed. Results: The final study cohort consisted of 208 radiologic-pathologic concordant CNBs, including 98 fADH and 110 nonfocal ADH. The imaging targets were calcifications (n = 157), a mass (n = 15), nonmass enhancement (n = 27), and mass enhancement (n = 9). Excision of fADH yielded seven (7%) upgrades (5 ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), 2 invasive carcinoma) versus 24 (22%) upgrades (16 DCIS, 8 invasive carcinoma) at excision of nonfocal ADH (p = 0.01). Both invasive carcinomas found at excision of fADH were subcentimeter tubular carcinomas away from the biopsy site and deemed incidental. Conclusions: Our data show a significantly lower upgrade rate at excision of focal ADH than nonfocal ADH. This information can be valuable if nonsurgical management of patients with radiologic-pathologic concordant CNB diagnosis of focal ADH is being considered. © 2023, Society of Surgical Oncology.
Journal Title: Annals of Surgical Oncology
Volume: 30
Issue: 7
ISSN: 1068-9265
Publisher: Springer  
Date Published: 2023-01-01
Start Page: 4087
End Page: 4094
Language: English
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13319-4
PUBMED: 36905438
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC10542905
DOI/URL:
Notes: The MSK Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA008748) is acknowledged in PubMed and PDF -- Corresponding author is MSK author: Anne Grabenstetter -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Monica Morrow
    772 Morrow
  2. Dilip D Giri
    184 Giri
  3. Hannah Yong Wen
    303 Wen
  4. Sandra B Brennan
    40 Brennan
  5. Edi Brogi
    517 Brogi
  6. Maria Gabriela Kuba
    29 Kuba