Tenosynovial giant cell tumor observational platform project (TOPP) registry: A 2-year analysis of patient-reported outcomes and treatment strategies Journal Article


Authors: Palmerini, E.; Healey, J. H.; Bernthal, N. M.; Bauer, S.; Schreuder, H.; Leithner, A.; Martin-Broto, J.; Gouin, F.; Lopez-Bastida, J.; Gelderblom, H.; Staals, E. L.; Mercier, F.; Laeis, P.; Ye, X.; van de Sande, M.
Article Title: Tenosynovial giant cell tumor observational platform project (TOPP) registry: A 2-year analysis of patient-reported outcomes and treatment strategies
Abstract: Background: The Tenosynovial giant cell tumor Observational Platform Project (TOPP) registry is an international prospective study that -previously described the impact of diffuse-type tenosynovial giant cell tumour (D-TGCT) on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from a baseline snapshot. This analysis describes the impact of D-TGCT at 2-year follow-up based on treatment strategies. Material and Methods: TOPP was conducted at 12 sites (EU: 10; US: 2). Captured PRO measurements assessed at baseline, 1-year, and 2-year follow-ups were Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), Pain Interference, BPI Pain Severity, Worst Pain, EQ-5D-5L, Worst Stiffness, and -Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System. Treatment interventions were no current/planned treatment (Off-Treatment) and systemic treatment/surgery (On-Treatment). Results: A total of 176 patients (mean age: 43.5 years) were included in the full analysis set. For patients without active treatment strategy -(Off-Treatment) at baseline (n = 79), BPI Pain Interference (1.00 vs. 2.86) and BPI Pain Severity scores (1.50 vs. 3.00) were numerically favorable in patients remaining Off-Treatment compared with those who switched to an active treatment strategy at year 1. From 1-year to 2-year -follow-ups, patients who remained Off-Treatment had better BPI Pain Interference (0.57 vs. 2.57) and Worst Pain (2.0 vs. 4.5) scores compared with patients who switched to an alternative treatment strategy. In addition, EQ-5D VAS scores (80.0 vs. 65.0) were higher in patients who remained -Off-Treatment between 1-year and 2-year follow-ups compared with patients who changed treatment strategy. For patients receiving systemic treatment at baseline, numerically favorable scores were seen in patients remaining on systemic therapy at 1-year follow-up: BPI Pain Interference (2.79 vs. 5.93), BPI Pain Severity (3.63 vs. 6.38), Worst Pain (4.5 vs. 7.5), and Worst Stiffness (4.0 vs. 7.5). From 1-year to 2-year follow-up, EQ-5D VAS scores (77.5 vs. 65.0) were higher in patients who changed from systemic treatment to a different treatment strategy. Conclusion: These findings highlight the impact D-TGCT has on patient quality of life, and how treatment strategies may be influenced by these outcome measures. (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT02948088) © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press.
Keywords: prospective; quality of life (qol); patient-reported outcome (pro); pexidartinib; diffuse-tgct; tenosynovial giant cell tumor observational platform project (topp)
Journal Title: The Oncologist
Volume: 28
Issue: 6
ISSN: 1083-7159
Publisher: Oxford University Press  
Date Published: 2023-06-01
Start Page: e425
End Page: e435
Language: English
DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyad011
PUBMED: 36869793
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC10243766
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- MSK Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA008748) acknowledged in PDF -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. John H Healey
    547 Healey