Health-related quality of life after robotic-assisted vs open radical cystectomy: Analysis of a randomized trial Journal Article


Authors: Clements, M. B.; Beech, B. B.; Atkinson, T. M.; Dalbagni, G. M.; Li, Y.; Vickers, A. J.; Herr, H. W.; Donat, S. M.; Sjoberg, D. D.; Tin, A. L.; Coleman, J. A.; Rapkin, B. D.; Laudone, V. P.; Bochner, B. H.
Article Title: Health-related quality of life after robotic-assisted vs open radical cystectomy: Analysis of a randomized trial
Abstract: Purpose:We compare health-related quality of life using a broad range of validated measures in patients randomized to robotic-assisted radical cystectomy vs open radical cystectomy.Methods:We retrospectively analyzed patients that had enrolled in both a randomized controlled trial comparing robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy vs open radical cystectomy and a separate prospective study of health-related quality of life. The prospective health-related quality of life study collected 14 patient-reported outcomes measures preoperatively and at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months postoperatively. Linear mixed-effects models with an interaction term (study arm×time) were used to test for differences in mean domain scores and differing effects of approach over time, adjusting for baseline scores.Results:A total of 72 patients were analyzed (n=32 robotic-assisted radical cystectomy, n=40 open radical cystectomy). From 3-24 months post-radical cystectomy, no significant differences in mean scores were detected. Mean differences were small in the following European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 (Core Quality of Life Questionnaire) domains: Global Quality of Life (-1.1; 95% CI -8.4, 6.2), Physical Functioning (-0.4; 95% CI -5.8, 5.0), Role Functioning (0.7; 95% CI -8.6, 10.0). Mean differences were also small in bladder cancer-specific domains (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-BLM30 [Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire]): Body Image (2.9; 95% CI -7.2, 13.1), Urinary Symptoms (8.0; 95% CI -3.0, 19.0). In Urostomy Symptoms, there was a significant interaction term (P <.001) due to lower open radical cystectomy scores at 3 and 24 months. Other domains evaluating urinary, bowel, sexual, and psychosocial health-related quality of life were similar.Conclusions:Over a broad range of health-related quality of life domains comparing robotic-assisted radical cystectomy and open radical cystectomy, there are unlikely to be clinically relevant differences in the medium to long term, and therefore health-related quality of life over this time period should not be a consideration in choosing between approaches. © 2023 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.
Keywords: adult; controlled study; treatment outcome; cancer surgery; retrospective studies; major clinical study; outcome assessment; prospective study; prospective studies; quality of life; randomized controlled trial; retrospective study; bladder cancer; bladder tumor; urinary bladder neoplasms; postoperative complication; postoperative complications; questionnaire; cystectomy; carcinoma; intermethod comparison; intestine function; sexual function; body image; transitional cell; secondary analysis; urinary dysfunction; patient-reported outcome; procedures; humans; human; male; female; article; robot-assisted radical cystectomy; robotic surgical procedures; robot assisted surgery; open radical cystectomy; european organization for research and treatment of cancer quality of life questionnaire core 30
Journal Title: Journal of Urology
Volume: 209
Issue: 5
ISSN: 0022-5347
Publisher: Elsevier Science, Inc.  
Date Published: 2023-05-01
Start Page: 901
End Page: 909
Language: English
DOI: 10.1097/ju.0000000000003201
PUBMED: 36724053
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC10150857
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- MSK Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA008748) acknowledged in PubMed and PDF -- MSK corresponding author in Bernard Bochner -- Export Date: 1 May 2023 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Yuelin Li
    219 Li
  2. Jonathan Coleman
    341 Coleman
  3. Vincent Laudone
    136 Laudone
  4. Guido Dalbagni
    325 Dalbagni
  5. Sherri M Donat
    174 Donat
  6. Andrew J Vickers
    880 Vickers
  7. Thomas Michael Atkinson
    155 Atkinson
  8. Daniel D. Sjoberg
    234 Sjoberg
  9. Bernard Bochner
    468 Bochner
  10. Harry W Herr
    594 Herr
  11. Amy Lam Ling Tin
    114 Tin
  12. Benjamin Buckler Beech
    8 Beech