Interim analysis of a prospective validation of 2 blood-based genomic assessments (PPQ and NETest) to determine the clinical efficacy of (177)Lu-DOTATATE in neuroendocrine tumors Journal Article


Authors: Bodei, L.; Raj, N.; Do, R. K.; Mauguen, A.; Krebs, S.; Reidy-Lagunes, D.; Schöder, H.
Article Title: Interim analysis of a prospective validation of 2 blood-based genomic assessments (PPQ and NETest) to determine the clinical efficacy of (177)Lu-DOTATATE in neuroendocrine tumors
Abstract: Reliable biomarkers for neuroendocrine tumor (NET) management during peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) are lacking. We validated the role of 2 circulating biomarkers: the PRRT prediction quotient (PPQ) as a predictive marker for response and the NETest as a monitoring biomarker. Furthermore, we evaluated whether tissue-based genetic alterations are effective in predicting progression-free survival (PFS). Methods: Data were prospectively collected on patients at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center with 177Lu-DOTATATE-treated somatostatin receptor (SSTR)-positive gastroenteropancreatic and lung NETs (n = 67; median age, 66 y; 52% female; 42% pancreatic, 39% small-bowel; 78% grade 1 or 2). All cases were metastatic (89% liver) and had received 1-8 prior treatments (median, 3), including somatostatin analogs (91%), surgery (55%), or chemotherapy (49%). Treatment response included PFS. According to RECIST, version 1.1, responders had stable disease or a partial response (disease-control rate) and nonresponders had progression. Blood was collected before each cycle and at follow-up. Samples were deidentified and assayed and underwent masked analyses. The gene expression assays included RNA isolation, real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction, and multialgorithm analyses. The PPQ (positive predicts a responder; negative predicts a nonresponder) at baseline was determined. The NETest (0-100 score) was performed. Statistics were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U testing (2-tailed) or Kaplan-Meier survival testing (PFS). In patients with archival tumor tissue, next-generation sequencing was performed through an institutional platform (Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets). Results: Forty-one patients (61%) were responders. PPQ accurately predicted 96% (64/67). The hazard ratio for prediction was 24.4 (95% CI, 8.2-72.5). Twelve-month disease control was 97% for PPQ-positive patients versus 26% for PPQ-negative patients (P < 0.0001). Median progression-free survival was not reached in those predicted to respond (PPQ-positive, n = 40) but was 8 mo in those predicted not to respond (PPQ-negative, n = 27). The NETest result in responders was 67 ± 25 at baseline and significantly (P < 0.05) decreased (-37 ± 44%) at follow-up. The NETest result in nonresponders was 44 ± 23 at baseline and significantly (P < 0.05) increased (+76% ± 56%) at progression. Overall, the NETest changes (increases or decreases) were 90% accurate. Thirty patients underwent next-generation sequencing. Tumors were microsatellite-stable, and the median mutational burden was 1.8. Alterations involved mainly the mTOR/PTEN/TSC pathway (30%). No relationship was associated with PRRT response. Conclusion: Our interim analysis confirmed that PPQ is an accurate predictor of 177Lu-DOTATATE responsiveness (radiosensitivity) and that NETest changes accurately correlated with treatment response. Tissue-based molecular genetic information had little value in PRRT prediction. Blood-based gene signatures may improve the management of patients undergoing 177Lu-DOTATATE by providing information on tumor radiosensitivity and disease course, thus allowing individualized strategies. © 2023 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.
Keywords: treatment outcome; aged; genetics; neuroendocrine tumor; genomics; octreotide; organometallic compound; organometallic compounds; somatostatin; neuroendocrine tumors; net; humans; human; male; female; prrt; netest; ppq; copper dotatate cu-64
Journal Title: Journal of Nuclear Medicine
Volume: 64
Issue: 4
ISSN: 0161-5505
Publisher: Society of Nuclear Medicine  
Date Published: 2023-04-01
Start Page: 567
End Page: 573
Language: English
DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.264363
PUBMED: 36396457
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC10071782
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- MSK Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA008748) acknowledged in PDF -- MSK corresponding author is Lisa Bodei --Export Date: 1 May 2023 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Heiko Schoder
    551 Schoder
  2. Diane Lauren Reidy
    294 Reidy
  3. Kinh Gian Do
    258 Do
  4. Nitya Prabhakar Raj
    107 Raj
  5. Audrey   Mauguen
    157 Mauguen
  6. Simone Susanne Krebs
    56 Krebs
  7. Lisa   Bodei
    207 Bodei