Outcomes of patients with positive interim positron emission tomography (PET) continuing ABVD in the clinical setting Journal Article


Authors: Zheng, S.; Gupta, K.; Goyal, P.; Nakajima, R.; Michaud, L.; Batlevi, C. L.; Hamlin, P. A.; Horwitz, S.; Kumar, A.; Matasar, M. J.; Moskowitz, A. J.; Moskowitz, C. H.; Noy, A.; Palomba, M. L.; Straus, D. J.; Von Keudell, G.; Falchi, L.; Yahalom, J.; Zelenetz, A. D.; Younes, A.; Salles, G.; Schöder, H.; Joffe, E.
Article Title: Outcomes of patients with positive interim positron emission tomography (PET) continuing ABVD in the clinical setting
Abstract: Simple Summary: This study aimed to highlight limitations in the use of interim PET (iPET) for treatment decisions and prognostication in the frontline management of Hodgkin's lymphoma. It reinforces the observation from the ECHELON-1 study that outcomes of patients with a positive interim PET who nonetheless continue treatment with ABVD are not as dismal as previously described. Furthermore, we describe the performance of PET positivity grading by a quantitative measure based on SUV ratios compared to the subjective Deauville scoring. Recent prospective clinical trial data suggest that patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma who continue treatment with ABVD, despite failing to attain a complete metabolic response on interim PET (PET2+), may fare better than previously published. We describe the outcomes of PET2+ patients who continued ABVD and compare the performance of a quantitative measure based on the lesion-to-liver SUV ratio (LLS qPET2+) to that of the subjective Deauville criteria (dvPET2+). We analyzed all patients with newly diagnosed advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma treated with frontline ABVD at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center between 2008 and 2017. Eligibility was set to correspond with the RATHL inclusion criteria. Images were reviewed by two nuclear medicine physicians and discordant cases were resolved with a third expert in consensus. qPET2+ was defined as LLS ≥ 1.3. We identified 227 patients of whom 25% (57) were qPET2+, but only 14% (31) were dvPET2+. Forty-eight patients (84%) continued ABVD with a 3-year PFS of 70% for qPET2+ and 64% for dvPET2+. In conclusion, interim PET interpretation in clinical practice may be associated with a higher rate of scans deemed positive. Irrespective of the criteria for PET2 positivity, a subset of patients may continue ABVD without a dismal outcome.
Journal Title: Cancers
Volume: 15
Issue: 6
ISSN: 2072-6694
Publisher: MDPI  
Date Published: 2023-03-02
Start Page: 1760
Language: English
DOI: 10.3390/cancers15061760
PROVIDER: EBSCOhost
PROVIDER: cinahl
PMCID: PMC10046293
PUBMED: 36980646
DOI/URL:
Notes: Accession Number: 162751159 -- Entry Date: In Process -- Revision Date: 20230403 -- Publication Type: Article -- Journal Subset: Biomedical; Continental Europe; Europe -- NLM UID: 101526829. -- Source: Cinahl
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Joachim Yahalom
    633 Yahalom
  2. Craig Moskowitz
    407 Moskowitz
  3. Ariela Noy
    368 Noy
  4. Maria Lia Palomba
    440 Palomba
  5. Steven M Horwitz
    663 Horwitz
  6. Heiko Schoder
    550 Schoder
  7. Andrew D Zelenetz
    781 Zelenetz
  8. Alison Moskowitz
    355 Moskowitz
  9. Paul Hamlin
    291 Hamlin
  10. Matthew J Matasar
    292 Matasar
  11. David J Straus
    360 Straus
  12. Anita Kumar
    195 Kumar
  13. Connie Wing-Ching Lee Batlevi
    177 Batlevi
  14. Anas Younes
    320 Younes
  15. Laure   Michaud
    34 Michaud
  16. Erel Joffe
    84 Joffe
  17. Lorenzo Falchi
    130 Falchi
  18. Gilles Andre Salles
    299 Salles