Supine magnetic resonance image registration for breast surgery: Insights on material mechanics Journal Article


Authors: Ringel, M. J.; Richey, W. L.; Heiselman, J. S.; Luo, M.; Meszoely, I. M.; Miga, M. I.
Article Title: Supine magnetic resonance image registration for breast surgery: Insights on material mechanics
Abstract: Purpose: Breast conserving surgery (BCS) is a common procedure for early-stage breast cancer patients. Supine preoperative magnetic resonance (MR) breast imaging for visualizing tumor location and extent, while not standard for procedural guidance, is being explored since it more closely represents the surgical presentation compared to conventional diagnostic imaging positions. Despite this preoperative imaging position, deformation is still present between the supine imaging and surgical state. As a result, a fast and accurate image-to-physical registration approach is needed to realize image-guided breast surgery. Approach: In this study, three registration methods were investigated on healthy volunteers' breasts (n = 11) with the supine arm-down position simulating preoperative imaging and supine arm-up position simulating intraoperative presentation. The registration methods included (1) point-based rigid registration using synthetic fiducials, (2) nonrigid biomechanical modelbased registration using sparse data, and (3) a data-dense three-dimensional diffeomorphic image-based registration from the Advanced Normalization Tools (ANTs) repository. Additionally, deformation metrics (volume change and anisotropy) were calculated from the ANTs deformation field to better understand breast material mechanics. Results: The average target registration errors (TRE) were 10.4 ± 2.3, 6.4 ± 1.5, and 2.8 ± 1.3 mm (mean ± standard deviation) and the average fiducial registration errors (FRE) were 7.8 ± 1.7, 2.5 ± 1.1, and 3.1 ± 1.1 mm for the point-based rigid, nonrigid biomechanical, and ANTs registrations, respectively. The mechanics-based deformation metrics revealed an overall anisotropic tissue behavior and a statistically significant difference in volume change between glandular and adipose tissue, suggesting that nonrigid modeling methods may be improved by incorporating material heterogeneity and anisotropy. Conclusions: Overall, registration accuracy significantly improved with increasingly flexible and data-dense registration methods. Analysis of these outcomes may inform the future development of image guidance systems for lumpectomy procedures. © 2022 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE).
Keywords: clinical article; nuclear magnetic resonance imaging; magnetic resonance imaging; preoperative evaluation; breast cancer; registration; image enhancement; medical imaging; diagnosis; volume; breast surgery; diseases; tissue; image registration; anisotropy; lumpectomy; biomechanics; registration methods; finite element method; deformable image registration; three-dimensional imaging; measurement accuracy; human; article; surgical guidance; breast tissue; image artifact; finite element modeling; element models; normalisation; image registration algorithm
Journal Title: Journal of Medical Imaging
Volume: 9
Issue: 6
ISSN: 2329-4302
Publisher: SPIE  
Date Published: 2022-11-01
Start Page: 065001
Language: English
DOI: 10.1117/1.Jmi.9.6.065001
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC9659944
PUBMED: 36388143
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors