Analysis of BRCA2 copy number loss and genomic instability in circulating tumor cells from patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer Journal Article


Authors: Barnett, E. S.; Schultz, N.; Stopsack, K. H.; Lam, E. T.; Arfe, A.; Lee, J.; Zhao, J. L.; Schonhoft, J. D.; Carbone, E. A.; Keegan, N. M.; Wibmer, A.; Wang, Y.; Solit, D. B.; Abida, W.; Wenstrup, R.; Scher, H. I.
Article Title: Analysis of BRCA2 copy number loss and genomic instability in circulating tumor cells from patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer
Abstract: Background: BRCA2 alterations predict for a response to poly-ADP-ribose polymerase inhibition in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, detection is hindered by insufficient tumor tissue and low sensitivity of cell-free DNA for detecting copy number loss. Objective: To evaluate the BRCA2 loss detection using single-cell, shallow whole-genome sequencing (sWGS) of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in patients with mCRPC. Design, setting, and participants: We analyzed CTC samples collected concurrently with tumor biopsies intended for clinical sequencing in patients with progressing mCRPC. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Differences in proportions were evaluated using the chi-square test. Correlations between assays were analyzed in linear regression models. Associations between alterations and genomic instability were assessed on the single-cell level using mixed-effect negative binomial models. Results and limitations: We identified 138 patients with concurrent CTC and biopsy samples. CTC sWGS generated copy number profiles in a similar proportion of patients to biopsy samples (83% vs 78%, p = 0.23), but was more effective than bone biopsies (79% vs 50%; p = 0.009). CTC sWGS detected BRCA2 loss in more patients than tissue at the ≥1 (42% vs 16%; p < 0.001) and ≥2 (27% vs 16%; p = 0.028) CTC thresholds. The overall prevalence of BRCA2 loss was not increased in CTCs using sample-level composite z scores (p = 0.4), but was significantly increased compared with a lower-than-expected prevalence in bone samples (21% vs 3%, p = 0.014). Positive/negative predictive values for CTC BRCA2 loss were 89%/96% using the ≥1 CTC threshold and 67%/92% using the composite z score. CTC BRCA2 loss was associated with higher genomic instability in univariate (1.4-fold large-scale transition difference, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2–1.6; p < 0.001) and multivariable analysis (1.4-fold difference, 95% CI: 1.2–1.6; p < 0.001). Conclusions: Copy number profiles can reliably be generated using CTC sWGS, which detected a majority of tissue-confirmed BRCA2 loss and “CTC-only” losses. BRCA2 losses were supported by increases in genomic instability. Patient summary: Current testing strategies have limitations in their ability to detect BRCA2 loss, a relatively common alteration in prostate cancer that is used to identify patients who may benefit from targeted therapy. In this paper, we evaluated whether we could detect BRCA2 loss in individual tumor cells isolated from patient blood samples and found this method to be suitable for further analysis. © 2022
Keywords: adult; controlled study; human tissue; aged; middle aged; human cell; major clinical study; genetics; prevalence; tumor biopsy; pathology; brca2 protein; tumor marker; neoplastic cells, circulating; genomic instability; chromosomal instability; cell level; false positive result; dna extraction; circulating tumor cells; brca2; tumor embolism; predictive value; circulating tumor cell; dna copy number variations; castration resistant prostate cancer; copy number variation; bone biopsy; brca2 protein, human; humans; human; male; article; whole genome sequencing; prostatic neoplasms, castration-resistant; metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer; copy number loss; biomarkers, tumor; homologous recombination deficiency; single-cell sequencing
Journal Title: European Urology
Volume: 83
Issue: 2
ISSN: 0302-2838
Publisher: Elsevier Science, Inc.  
Date Published: 2023-02-01
Start Page: 112
End Page: 120
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.08.010
PUBMED: 36123219
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC10228632
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- MSK Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA008748) acknowledged in PubMed and PDF -- MSK corresponding author is Howard Scher -- Export Date: 1 March 2023 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. David Solit
    781 Solit
  2. Howard Scher
    1131 Scher
  3. Wassim Abida
    158 Abida
  4. Nikolaus D Schultz
    491 Schultz
  5. Andreas Georg Wibmer
    54 Wibmer
  6. Jimmy Liu Zhao
    21 Zhao
  7. Ethan Sean Barnett
    31 Barnett
  8. Emily Ann Carbone
    27 Carbone
  9. Niamh Marie Keegan
    19 Keegan
  10. Andrea Arfe
    15 Arfe