Commercial price variation for breast reconstruction in the era of price transparency Journal Article


Authors: Rochlin, D. H.; Rizk, N. M.; Matros, E.; Wagner, T. H.; Sheckter, C. C.
Article Title: Commercial price variation for breast reconstruction in the era of price transparency
Abstract: Importance: Breast reconstruction is costly, and negotiated commercial rates have been hidden from public view. The Hospital Price Transparency Rule was enacted in 2021 to facilitate market competition and lower health care costs. Breast reconstruction pricing should be analyzed to evaluate for market effectiveness and opportunities to lower the cost of health care. Objective: To evaluate the extent of commercial price variation for breast reconstruction. The secondary objective was to characterize the price of breast reconstruction in relation to market concentration and payer mix. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a cross-sectional study conducted from January to April 2022 using 2021 pricing data made available after the Hospital Price Transparency Rule. National data were obtained from Turquoise Health, a data service platform that aggregates price disclosures from hospital websites. Participants were included from all hospitals with disclosed pricing data for breast reconstructive procedures, identified by Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code. Main Outcomes and Measures: Price variation was measured via within- and across-hospital ratios. A mixed-effects linear model evaluated commercial rates relative to governmental rates and the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (health care market concentration) at the facility level. Linear regression was used to evaluate commercial rates as a function of facility characteristics. Results: A total of 69834 unique commercial rates were extracted from 978 facilities across 335 metropolitan areas. Commercial rates increased as health care markets became less competitive (coefficient, $4037.52; 95% CI, $700.12 to $7374.92; P =.02; for Herfindahl-Hirschman Index [HHI] 1501-2500, coefficient $3290.21; 95% CI, $878.08 to $5702.34; P =.01; both compared with HHI ≤1500). Commercial rates demonstrated economically insignificant associations with Medicare and Medicaid rates (Medicare coefficient, -$0.05; 95% CI, -$0.14 to $0.03; P =.23; Medicaid coefficient, $0.14; 95% CI, $0.07 to $0.22; P <.001). Safety-net and nonprofit hospitals reported lower commercial rates (coefficient, -$3269.58; 95% CI, -$3815.42 to -$2723.74; P <.001 and coefficient, -$1892.79; -$2519.61 to -$1265.97; P <.001, respectively). Extra-large hospitals (400+ beds) reported higher commercial rates compared with their smaller counterparts (coefficient, $1036.07; 95% CI, $198.29 to $1873.85, P =.02). Conclusions and Relevance: Study results suggest that commercial rates for breast reconstruction demonstrated large nationwide variation. Higher commercial rates were associated with less competitive markets and facilities that were large, for-profit, and nonsafety net. Privately insured patients with breast cancer may experience higher premiums and deductibles as US hospital market consolidation and for-profit hospitals continue to grow. Transparency policies should be continued along with actions that facilitate greater health care market competition. There was no evidence that facilities increase commercial rates in response to lower governmental rates.. © 2022 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
Keywords: controlled study; aged; major clinical study; united states; cancer patient; breast reconstruction; mammaplasty; health care cost; medicaid; medicare; reimbursement; economics; cross-sectional study; cross-sectional studies; health care costs; health care delivery; delivery of health care; commercial phenomena; population density; humans; human; article; price; current procedural terminology; market; safety net hospital; non profit hospital; price transparency
Journal Title: JAMA Surgery
Volume: 158
Issue: 2
ISSN: 2168-6254
Publisher: American Medical Association  
Date Published: 2023-02-01
Start Page: 152
End Page: 160
Language: English
DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.6402
PUBMED: 36515928
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC9856784
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- MSK Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA008748) acknowledged in PubMed and PDF -- Export Date: 1 March 2023 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Evan Matros
    202 Matros
  2. Danielle Helena Rochlin
    18 Rochlin