Durvalumab with or without tremelimumab versus the EXTREME regimen as first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: KESTREL, a randomized, open-label, phase III study Journal Article


Authors: Psyrri, A.; Fayette, J.; Harrington, K.; Gillison, M.; Ahn, M. J.; Takahashi, S.; Weiss, J.; Machiels, J. P.; Baxi, S.; Vasilyev, A.; Karpenko, A.; Dvorkin, M.; Hsieh, C. Y.; Thungappa, S. C.; Segura, P. P.; Vynnychenko, I.; Haddad, R.; Kasper, S.; Mauz, P. S.; Baker, V.; He, P.; Evans, B.; Wildsmith, S.; Olsson, R. F.; Yovine, A.; Kurland, J. F.; Morsli, N.; Seiwert, T. Y.; for the KESTREL Investigators
Article Title: Durvalumab with or without tremelimumab versus the EXTREME regimen as first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: KESTREL, a randomized, open-label, phase III study
Abstract: Background: Patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC) have a poor prognosis. The phase III KESTREL study evaluated the efficacy of durvalumab [programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody] with or without tremelimumab [cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) antibody], versus the EXTREME regimen in patients with R/M HNSCC. Patients and methods: Patients with HNSCC who had not received prior systemic treatment for R/M disease were randomized (2: 1: 1) to receive durvalumab 1500 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) plus tremelimumab 75 mg Q4W (up to four doses), durvalumab monotherapy 1500 mg Q4W, or the EXTREME regimen (platinum, 5-fluorouracil, and cetuximab) until disease progression. Durvalumab efficacy, with or without tremelimumab, versus the EXTREME regimen in patients with PD-L1-high tumors and in all randomized patients was assessed. Safety was also assessed. Results: Durvalumab and durvalumab plus tremelimumab were not superior to EXTREME for overall survival (OS) in patients with PD-L1-high expression [median, 10.9 and 11.2 versus 10.9 months, respectively; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.96; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.69-1.32; P = 0.787 and HR = 1.05; 95% CI 0.80-1.39, respectively]. Durvalumab and durvalumab plus tremelimumab prolonged duration of response versus EXTREME (49.3% and 48.1% versus 9.8% of patients remaining in response at 12 months), correlating with long-term OS for responding patients; however, median progression-free survival was longer with EXTREME (2.8 and 2.8 versus 5.4 months). Exploratory analyses suggested that subsequent immunotherapy use by 24.3% of patients in the EXTREME regimen arm contributed to the similar OS outcomes between arms. Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) for durvalumab, durvalumab plus tremelimumab, and EXTREME were 8.9%, 19.1%, and 53.1%, respectively. Conclusions: In patients with PD-L1-high expression, OS was comparable between durvalumab and the EXTREME regimen. Durvalumab alone, and with tremelimumab, demonstrated durable responses and reduced TRAEs versus the EXTREME regimen in R/M HNSCC. © 2022 The Authors
Keywords: head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; tremelimumab; durvalumab; immune checkpoint inhibition; programmed death-ligand 1; phase iii study
Journal Title: Annals of Oncology
Volume: 34
Issue: 3
ISSN: 0923-7534
Publisher: Oxford University Press  
Date Published: 2023-03-01
Start Page: 262
End Page: 274
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.12.008
PUBMED: 36535565
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 1 March 2023 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Shrujal S Baxi
    107 Baxi