Delirium in critically ill cancer patients with COVID-19 Journal Article


Authors: Bjerre Real, C.; Dhawan, V.; Sharma, M.; Seier, K.; Tan, K. S.; Matsoukas, K.; Maloy, M.; Voigt, L.; Alici, Y.; Chawla, S.
Article Title: Delirium in critically ill cancer patients with COVID-19
Abstract: Background: COVID-19 has been a devastating pandemic with little known of its neuropsychiatric complications. Delirium is one of the most common neuropsychiatric syndromes among hospitalized cancer patients with incidence ranging from 25% to 40% and rates of up to 85% in the terminally ill. Data on the incidence, risk factors, duration, and outcomes of delirium in critically ill cancer patients with COVID-19 are lacking. Objective: To report the incidence, risks and outcomes of critically ill cancer patients who developed COVID-19. Methods: This is a retrospective single-center study evaluating delirium frequency and outcomes in all critically ill cancer patients with COVID-19 admitted between March 1 and July 10, 2020. Delirium was assessed by Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Unit, performed twice daily by trained intensive care unit (ICU) nursing staff. Patients were considered to have a delirium-positive day if Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Unit was positive at least once per day. Results: A total of 70 patients were evaluated. Of those 70, 53 (75.7%) were found to be positive for delirium. Patients with delirium were significantly older than patients without delirium (median age 67.5 vs 60.3 y, P = 0.013). There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics, chronic medical conditions, neuropsychiatric history, cancer type, or application of prone positioning between the 2 groups. Delirium patients were less likely to receive cancer-directed therapies (58.5% vs 88.2%, P = 0.038) but more likely to receive antipsychotics (81.1% vs 41.2%, P = 0.004), dexmedetomidine (79.3% vs 11.8%, P < 0.001), steroids (84.9% vs 58.8%, P = 0.039), and vasopressors (90.6% vs 58.8%, P = 0.006). Delirium patients were more likely to be intubated (86.8% vs 41.2%, P < 0.001), and all tracheostomies (35.9%) occurred in patients with delirium. ICU length of stay (19 vs 8 d, P < 0.001) and hospital length of stay (37 vs 12 d, P < 0.001) were significantly longer in delirium patients, but there was no statistically significant difference in hospital mortality (43.4% vs 58.8%, P = 0.403) or ICU mortality (34.0% vs 58.8%, P = 0.090). Conclusions: Delirium in critically ill cancer patients with COVID-19 was associated with less cancer-directed therapies and increased hospital and ICU length of stay. However, the presence of delirium was not associated with an increase in hospital or ICU mortality. © 2022 Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry
Keywords: adult; cancer chemotherapy; controlled study; aged; leukemia; cancer surgery; retrospective studies; major clinical study; cancer patient; cancer radiotherapy; antineoplastic agent; neoplasm; neoplasms; cancer immunotherapy; multiple myeloma; breast cancer; opiate; propofol; delirium; incidence; steroid; retrospective study; urogenital tract cancer; cancer hormone therapy; chronic disease; confusion; intensive care unit; length of stay; intensive care units; lymphoma; benzodiazepine derivative; neuroleptic agent; mental disease; hospital admission; hydroxychloroquine; observational study; azithromycin; tracheostomy; infection risk; hypertensive factor; ketamine; critical illness; hypertensive agent; muscle relaxant agent; gastrointestinal cancer; dexmedetomidine; critically ill patient; medical history; molecularly targeted therapy; clonidine; nursing staff; complication; clinical outcome; demographics; critically ill; in-hospital mortality; endotracheal intubation; prone position; tocilizumab; cancer; humans; human; male; female; article; malignant neoplasm; thoracic cancer; coronavirus disease 2019; covid-19; remdesivir; cam-icu; confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit; intensive care psychosis; nervous system cancer
Journal Title: Journal of the Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry
Volume: 63
Issue: 6
ISSN: 2667-2979
Publisher: Elsevier Science, Inc.  
Date Published: 2022-11-01
Start Page: 539
End Page: 547
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaclp.2022.05.005
PUBMED: 35660676
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC9162788
DOI/URL:
Notes: The MSK Cancer Center Support Grant (P30 CA008748) is acknowledged in the PubMed record and PDF. Corresponding author is MSK author Sanjay Chawla. -- February 2023 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Sanjay Chawla
    49 Chawla
  2. Yesne Alici
    94 Alici
  3. Louis Pierre-Paul Voigt
    85 Voigt
  4. Molly Anna Maloy
    269 Maloy
  5. Kay See   Tan
    243 Tan
  6. Kenneth Seier
    107 Seier
  7. Vikram Dhawan
    16 Dhawan
  8. Mehak Sharma
    4 Sharma