Identifying participants’ preferences for modifiable chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy prevention clinical trial factors: An adaptive choice-based conjoint analysis Journal Article


Authors: Knoerl, R.; Berry, D.; Meyerhardt, J. A.; Reyes, K.; Salehi, E.; Thornton, K.; Gewandter, J. S.
Article Title: Identifying participants’ preferences for modifiable chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy prevention clinical trial factors: An adaptive choice-based conjoint analysis
Abstract: Purpose: There are no recommended treatments for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) prevention. Recruitment to CIPN prevention clinical trials is challenging because it is difficult to enroll patients between the time of cancer diagnosis and the initiation of neurotoxic chemotherapy. The purpose of this exploratory-sequential mixed-methods study was to determine patients’ preferences that could affect the choice to participate in CIPN prevention clinical trials. Methods: First, twenty cognitive interviews were conducted with adults who completed less than three neurotoxic chemotherapy infusions to clarify clinical trial attributes and levels thought to be important to patients when deciding whether to enroll in CIPN prevention trials (i.e., type of treatment, clinical tests, reimbursement, survey delivery; length of visits, timing of follow-up, when to begin treatment). Second, another eighty-eight patients completed an adaptive choice-based conjoint analysis survey that incorporated the finalized attributes and levels. Each level was assigned a part-worth utility score using Hierarchical Bayes Estimation. The relative importance of each attribute was calculated. Results: The attributes with the highest relative importance values were type of treatment (27.1%) and length of study visits (20.2%). The preferred levels included non-medicine treatment (53.49%), beginning treatment after experiencing CIPN (60.47%), email surveys (63.95%), assessments that include surveys and clinical exams (39.53%), under 30-min visits (44.19%), $50/week reimbursement (39.53%), and 1-month post-chemotherapy follow-up visits (32.56%). Conclusions: Patients’ preferences for participation may be included in the design of future CIPN prevention clinical trials to potentially bolster study enrollment. © 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Keywords: adult; aged; major clinical study; cisplatin; antineoplastic agents; paclitaxel; cancer staging; neurotoxicity; follow up; antineoplastic agent; neoplasms; breast cancer; bayes theorem; peripheral neuropathy; analytic method; health survey; vincristine; vinblastine; self report; docetaxel; sarcoma; reimbursement; questionnaire; patient participation; length of stay; prophylaxis; lymphoma; patient decision making; feedback system; oxaliplatin; choice behavior; qualitative research; chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy; peripheral nervous system diseases; gastrointestinal cancer; patient preference; clinical trial (topic); exploratory research; demographics; e-mail; patient-reported outcome; Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events; humans; human; male; female; article; adaptive clinical trial; surveys and questionnaires; adaptive choice based conjoint analysis
Journal Title: Supportive Care in Cancer
Volume: 30
Issue: 12
ISSN: 0941-4355
Publisher: Springer Verlag  
Date Published: 2022-12-01
Start Page: 9963
End Page: 9973
Language: English
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-07447-y
PUBMED: 36355216
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC9648439
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 3 January 2023 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors