A non-invasive artificial intelligence approach for the prediction of human blastocyst ploidy: A retrospective model development and validation study Journal Article


Authors: Barnes, J.; Brendel, M.; Gao, V. R.; Rajendran, S.; Kim, J.; Li, Q.; Malmsten, J. E.; Sierra, J. T.; Zisimopoulos, P.; Sigaras, A.; Khosravi, P.; Meseguer, M.; Zhan, Q.; Rosenwaks, Z.; Elemento, O.; Zaninovic, N.; Hajirasouliha, I.
Article Title: A non-invasive artificial intelligence approach for the prediction of human blastocyst ploidy: A retrospective model development and validation study
Abstract: Background: One challenge in the field of in-vitro fertilisation is the selection of the most viable embryos for transfer. Morphological quality assessment and morphokinetic analysis both have the disadvantage of intra-observer and inter-observer variability. A third method, preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A), has limitations too, including its invasiveness and cost. We hypothesised that differences in aneuploid and euploid embryos that allow for model-based classification are reflected in morphology, morphokinetics, and associated clinical information. Methods: In this retrospective study, we used machine-learning and deep-learning approaches to develop STORK-A, a non-invasive and automated method of embryo evaluation that uses artificial intelligence to predict embryo ploidy status. Our method used a dataset of 10 378 embryos that consisted of static images captured at 110 h after intracytoplasmic sperm injection, morphokinetic parameters, blastocyst morphological assessments, maternal age, and ploidy status. Independent and external datasets, Weill Cornell Medicine EmbryoScope+ (WCM-ES+; Weill Cornell Medicine Center of Reproductive Medicine, NY, USA) and IVI Valencia (IVI Valencia, Health Research Institute la Fe, Valencia, Spain) were used to test the generalisability of STORK-A and were compared measuring accuracy and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Findings: Analysis and model development included the use of 10 378 embryos, all with PGT-A results, from 1385 patients (maternal age range 21–48 years; mean age 36·98 years [SD 4·62]). STORK-A predicted aneuploid versus euploid embryos with an accuracy of 69·3% (95% CI 66·9–71·5; AUC 0·761; positive predictive value [PPV] 76·1%; negative predictive value [NPV] 62·1%) when using images, maternal age, morphokinetics, and blastocyst score. A second classification task trained to predict complex aneuploidy versus euploidy and single aneuploidy produced an accuracy of 74·0% (95% CI 71·7–76·1; AUC 0·760; PPV 54·9%; NPV 87·6%) using an image, maternal age, morphokinetic parameters, and blastocyst grade. A third classification task trained to predict complex aneuploidy versus euploidy had an accuracy of 77·6% (95% CI 75·0–80·0; AUC 0·847; PPV 76·7%; NPV 78·0%). STORK-A reported accuracies of 63·4% (AUC 0·702) on the WCM-ES+ dataset and 65·7% (AUC 0·715) on the IVI Valencia dataset, when using an image, maternal age, and morphokinetic parameters, similar to the STORK-A test dataset accuracy of 67·8% (AUC 0·737), showing generalisability. Interpretation: As a proof of concept, STORK-A shows an ability to predict embryo ploidy in a non-invasive manner and shows future potential as a standardised supplementation to traditional methods of embryo selection and prioritisation for implantation or recommendation for PGT-A. Funding: US National Institutes of Health. © 2023 Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license
Keywords: adult; middle aged; retrospective studies; young adult; united states; quality control; retrospective study; artificial intelligence; forecasting; pregnancy; aneuploidy; negative predictive value; positive predictive values; genetic testing; blastocyst; plants (botany); sperm; semen; procedures; classification (of information); ploidy; ploidies; maternal age; preimplantation diagnosis; aneuploids; preimplantation genetic diagnosis; humans; human; male; female; model validation; deep learning; valencia; classification tasks; model development
Journal Title: The Lancet Digital Health
Volume: 5
Issue: 1
ISSN: 2589-7500
Publisher: Elsevier Inc.  
Date Published: 2023-01-01
Start Page: e28
End Page: e40
Language: English
DOI: 10.1016/s2589-7500(22)00213-8
PUBMED: 36543475
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC10193126
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 3 January 2023 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors