Association of perceived benefit or burden of research participation with participants' withdrawal from cancer clinical trials Journal Article


Authors: Ulrich, C. M.; Ratcliffe, S. J.; Zhou, Q.; Huang, L.; Hochheimer, C.; Gordon, T.; Knafl, K.; Miller, V.; Naylor, M. D.; Schapira, M. M.; Richmond, T. S.; Grady, C.; Mao, J. J.
Article Title: Association of perceived benefit or burden of research participation with participants' withdrawal from cancer clinical trials
Abstract: Importance: Attrition in cancer clinical trials (CCTs) can lead to systematic bias, underpowered analyses, and a loss of scientific knowledge to improve treatments. Little attention has focused on retention, especially the role of perceived benefits and burdens, after participants have experienced the trial. Objectives: To examine the association between patients' perceived benefits and burdens of research participation and CCT retention. Design, Setting, and Participants: This survey study was conducted at a National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center in the Northeast region of the US. The sample included adult patients with a cancer diagnosis participating in cancer therapeutic trials. Data were collected from September 2015 to June 2019. Analysis of study data was ongoing since November 2019 through October 2022. Exposures: Self-reported validated survey instrument with a list of 22 benefits and 23 burdens of research participation that can be rated by patients with a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Main Outcomes and Measures: A primary outcome was actual withdrawal from the CCT, and a composite outcome was composite withdrawal that included both actual withdrawal and thoughts of withdrawing. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regressions were used. Results: Among the 334 participants in the sample, the mean (SD) age was 61.9 (11.5) years and 174 women (52.1%) were included. Top-cited benefits included both aspirational and action-oriented goals, including helping others (94.2%), contributing to society (90.3%), being treated respectfully (86.2%), and hoping for a cure (86.0%). Worry over receiving a placebo (61.3%), rearranging one's life (41.9%), and experiencing bothersome adverse effects (41.6%) were notable burdens. An increased burden score was associated with a higher probability of actual withdrawal (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.86; 95% CI, 1.1-3.17; P =.02) or composite withdrawal (adjusted OR, 3.44; 95% CI, 2.09-5.67; P <.001). An increased benefit score was associated with lower composite withdrawal (adjusted OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.24-0.66; P <.001). For participants who reported the benefits as being equal to or greater than the burdens, 13.4% withdrew. For those who perceived the benefits as being less than the burdens, 33.3% withdrew (adjusted OR, 3.38; 95% CI, 1.13-10.14; P =.03). The risk of withdrawal was even higher for the composite outcome (adjusted OR, 7.70; 95% CI, 2.76-21.48; P <.001). Conclusions and Relevance: This survey study found that patients perceived important benefits from CCT participation, and this perception was associated with trial retention, even among those who also perceived substantial burdens. A broader dialogue among stakeholders can inform an ethical and patient-centric focus on benefits throughout the course of a CCT to increase retention.. © 2022 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
Keywords: adult; middle aged; united states; neoplasm; neoplasms; national cancer institute (u.s.); adverse drug reaction; national health organization; hope; humans; human; female; drug-related side effects and adverse reactions; antisocial personality disorder
Journal Title: JAMA Network Open
Volume: 5
Issue: 11
ISSN: 2574-3805
Publisher: American Medical Association  
Date Published: 2022-11-01
Start Page: e2244412
Language: English
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.44412
PUBMED: 36449287
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC9713607
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 3 January 2023 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Jun J Mao
    243 Mao