LGBTQ+ worker protections: Implications for academic medicine today and in the future Editorial


Authors: Sánchez, N. F.; Kennedy, L.; Spigner, S. T.; Hartman, A. W.; Sánchez, J. P.; Callahan, E. J.
Title: LGBTQ+ worker protections: Implications for academic medicine today and in the future
Abstract: The Supreme Court's 2020 ruling prohibiting workplace discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity (Bostock v Clayton County) offers new legal protections for LGBTQ+ employees and allies and new opportunities for academic medicine to advance LGBTQ+ inclusion at their institutions. In this perspective piece, the authors examine the history of LGBTQ+ community recognition, tolerance, protections, and ongoing inclusion and the advocacy efforts led by LGBTQ+ patients, community activists, and medical colleagues. They also examine the current limitations of the court's ruling and recommend future actions to advance workplace and health equity. While recent advancements in equality have not erased chronic barriers to inclusion and advancement, they can pave the way for leaders in research, education, and clinical care to shape national health guidelines and policies that impact the health of all Americans. © 2022 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.
Keywords: organization; sexual behavior; gender identity; workplace; humans; human; male; female; organizations; sexual and gender minorities; sexual and gender minority
Journal Title: Academic Medicine
Volume: 97
Issue: 11
ISSN: 1040-2446
Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins  
Date Published: 2022-11-01
Start Page: 1597
End Page: 1604
Language: English
DOI: 10.1097/acm.0000000000004672
PUBMED: 35320123
PROVIDER: scopus
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 1 December 2022 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Nelson Felix Sanchez
    15 Sanchez