Early-phase clinical trial eligibility and response evaluation criteria for refractory, relapsed, or progressive neuroblastoma: A consensus statement from the National Cancer Institute clinical trials planning meeting Guidelines


Authors: Park, J. R.; Villablanca, J. G.; Hero, B.; Kushner, B. H.; Wheatley, K.; Beiske, K. H.; Ladenstein, R. L.; Baruchel, S.; Macy, M. E.; Moreno, L.; Seibel, N. L.; Pearson, A. D.; Matthay, K. K.; Valteau-Couanet, D.
Title: Early-phase clinical trial eligibility and response evaluation criteria for refractory, relapsed, or progressive neuroblastoma: A consensus statement from the National Cancer Institute clinical trials planning meeting
Abstract: Background: International standardized criteria for eligibility, evaluable disease sites, and disease response assessment in patients with refractory, progressive, or relapsed high-risk neuroblastoma enrolled in early-phase clinical trials are lacking. Methods: A National Cancer Institute–sponsored Clinical Trials Planning Meeting was convened to develop an international consensus to refine the tumor site eligibility criteria and evaluation of disease response for early-phase clinical trials in children with high-risk neuroblastoma. Results: Standardized data collection of patient and disease characteristics (including specified genomic data), eligibility criteria, a definition of evaluable disease, and response evaluations for primary and metastatic sites of disease were developed. Eligibility included two distinct patient groups: progressive disease and refractory disease. The refractory disease group was subdivided into responding persistent disease and stable persistent disease to better capture the clinical heterogeneity of refractory neuroblastoma. Requirements for defining disease evaluable for a response assessment were provided; they included requirements for biopsy to confirm viable neuroblastoma and/or ganglioneuroblastoma in those patients with soft tissue or bone disease not avid for iodine-123 meta-iodobenzylguanidine. Standardized evaluations for response components and time intervals for response evaluations were established. Conclusions: The use of international consensus eligibility, evaluability, and response criteria for early-phase clinical studies will facilitate the collection of comparable data across international trials and promote more rapid identification of effective treatment regimens for high-risk neuroblastoma. Ā© 2022 The Authors. Cancer published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Cancer Society.
Keywords: clinical trial; neuroblastoma; early phase; consensus criteria
Journal Title: Cancer
Volume: 128
Issue: 21
ISSN: 0008-543X
Publisher: Wiley Blackwell  
Date Published: 2022-11-01
Start Page: 3775
End Page: 3783
Language: English
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34445
PUBMED: 36101004
PROVIDER: scopus
PMCID: PMC9614386
DOI/URL:
Notes: Article -- Export Date: 1 November 2022 -- Source: Scopus
Altmetric
Citation Impact
BMJ Impact Analytics
MSK Authors
  1. Brian Kushner
    311 Kushner